STARLIMS Continues to Improve Performance with QM Solution V12.3 Service Pack 1

Archives

2006 • 2007 • 2008 • 2009 • 2010 • 2011 • 2012 • 2013 • 2014 • 2015 • 2016 • 2017 • 2018 • 2019 • 2020 • 2021 • 2022 • 2023 • 2024 •

Same old, same old... When is any definitive action being taken, if you do not mind me asking?

Attentively RevampedEditor (talk) 12:18, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked for 1 week. GiantSnowman 17:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did not do any good (but i thank you again nonetheless!), they resorted to IP editing and continue to do the same! --RevampedEditor (talk) 18:43, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sock blocked - if they continue let me know. GiantSnowman 20:10, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I was referred to you as an experienced football editor. I therefore ask you to please review some of my contribs (especially the longer ones). I'm curious what mistakes I make (especially language-wise, as I'm a non-native English speaker and other rules-wise) just to become better in the future. I am not exactly a new user (because I have some experience in pl wiki), but I guess it's not enough to be absolutely sure about myself here :) Regards, Karol739 (talk) 19:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing wrong with your language per se, but some improvements include this and this, to make it sound a bit better and more natural. GiantSnowman 20:47, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, in Tomasz Loska I've used that form, because "with a option to a further year" is a direct translation from Polish (from the sources). I did not want to cause any autorship rights inconveniences. Karol739 (talk) 13:01, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We should not be directly copying text (translated or otherwise) unless used as a quote. GiantSnowman 17:07, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's right. This is why I did it the other way. Karol739 (talk) 18:30, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Don’t know if you’re deliberately ignoring my question, or if you genuinely don’t get any notification when I reply to you on my talk page, but I’m posting it here in a final attempt to get you to answer my question.

My original question regarding your claim that there were no sources when editing the Jakob Dunsby article:

Hi again. This is now the third time you have had a problem with my sourcing (maybe you’ve had more problems, but at least these are the ones you have let me know about). Let me be the first one to admit that I’m definitely not without my mistakes, and that I try to make as few as possible. Again though, I struggle to see what the problem is. At least with the specific edit you are mentioning.

His middle name is mentioned in both the sources that's already in the article that are used to present who he is and where he plays, so it makes sense that I would include his full name, as it wasn’t there already. I don’t really know what else you want. I feel like if you had used the minute you used to write this message to check this instead, we would have been without this discussion. Maybe there is something I’m missing, and if that’s the case, I would love for you to enlighten me.

I’m hoping you’ll answer this time, as it is a question directed directly at you, but based on my previous attempts to engage in a conversation with you, I’m not holding my breath. Eggman02 (talk) 21:53, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What question, where? If you want to include a full name, that is welcome, but only if cited to a source. GiantSnowman 20:11, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]