Type a search term to find related articles by LIMS subject matter experts gathered from the most trusted and dynamic collaboration tools in the laboratory informatics industry.
“ | Jika aturan yang ada membuat Anda takut, dan menghambat Anda untuk berpartisipasi dalam Wikipedia, abaikan saja semua aturan. | ” |
— Wikipedia:Jangan terbebani aturan |
Peraturan kebanyakan dibuat untuk dilanggar dan seringkali agar orang malas dapat bersembunyi di baliknya.
Rules are for fools. (Peraturan itu hanya untuk orang-orang bodoh.)
— (Sebagaimana dipakai oleh para pelatih/motivator)[2]
Langgarlah peraturan, dan langgarlah dengan cara yang indah, telah dipertimbangkan dengan masak, dan baik. Itulah salah satu tujuan adanya peraturan.
Aturan itu hanya penghalang agar anak kecil agar tidak jatuh.
Berikan aku alasan menurut akal yang berimbang (bahwa kita harus) mendahulukan hukum setiap waktu. Kode dan pedoman menciptakan pola perilaku. Semua pola perilaku cenderung tidak akan dipertanyakan, mengumpulkan momentum kehancuran.
Peraturan menjadi bentuk kepatuhan orang-orang bodoh dan menjadi petunjuk orang-orang bijak.
Anda tidak perlu membaca aturan apapun sebelum memberikan kontribusi kepada Wikipedia. Jika Anda melakukan apa yang tampaknya bisa diterima, semestinya hal itu memang bisa diterima, dan jika tidak, jangan khawatir. Bahkan kesalahan yang paling fatal bisa dengan mudah dikoreksi: versi terdahulu dari sebuah halaman tetap ada di sejarah perubahannya dan dapat kembali diterbitkan. Jika kami tidak setuju dengan perubahan Anda, akan kita bicarakan matang-matang dengan sopan, dan kita akan menemukan jalan keluarnya. Jadi jangan khawatir. Jangan ragu menyunting artikel, dan bantulah membangun ensiklopedia gratis ini dengan senang hati.
Jangan terbebani aturan merupakan salah satu aturan tertua di Wikipedia, ditulis oleh Larry Sanger di tahun 2001. Dia menulis: "If rules make you nervous and depressed, and not desirous of participating in the wiki, then ignore them entirely and go about your business." (artinya: "Jika aturan yang ada membuat Anda ragu dan khawatir, dan tidak ingin ikut serta di wiki ini, maka abaikan aturan itu semuanya dan lanjutkan urusan Anda.")
Perlu dicatat bahwa mengabaikan semua aturan adalah hak semua, hal itu berbeda dari dengan sengaja melanggar aturan. Silakan bertapa merenungkannya baik-baik sebelum Anda benar-benar menerapkan aturan ini.
Sikap formalitas dan kemahiran adalah sikap yang berlawan dalam menerapkan aturan. Menerapkan aturan secara tersurat, kaku, tanpa bertanya, dalam semua kasus yang sesuai dan dalam semua kasus yang tidak sesuai, merukapan sikap formalitas... Menerapkan aturan dengan leluasa, pertimbangan, memperhatikan kasus mana saja yang sesuai, dan tanpa membiarkan bunyi aturan menghalangi tujuan dari tindakannya atau peluangnya dalam situasi tertentu, adalah kemahiran.
Sebuah masyarakat yang (dibangun) berlandaskan hukum tersurat dan menjadikannya landasan tertinggi adalah masyarakat yang memiliki keunggulan yang sangat langka yang mungkin (dicapai) oleh manusia.
Terlepas dari namanya, "Jangan terbebani aturan" tidak menyabotase aturan yang lain. Tujuannya adalah menjaga aturan yang lain itu menyabotase apa yang kita kerjakan di sini: membangun sebuah ensiklopedia bebas. Aturan tidak memiliki peran sama sekali dengan cita-cita ini. Jika aturan membantu cita-cita ini, bagus. Jika aturan justru merintanginya, aturan itu seketika itu juga ditiadakan.
Wikipedia has many policies or what many consider "rules". Instead of following every rule, it is acceptable to use common sense as you go about editing. Being too wrapped up in rules can cause loss of perspective, so there are times when it is better to ignore a rule. Even if a contribution "violates" the precise wording of a rule, it might still be a good contribution. Similarly, just because something is not forbidden in a written document, or is even explicitly permitted, doesn't mean it's a good idea in the given situation. Our goal is to improve Wikipedia so that it better informs readers. Being able to articulate "common sense" reasons why a change helps the encyclopedia is good, and editors should not ignore those reasons because they don't include a bunch of policy shortcuts. The principle of the rules—to make Wikipedia and its sister projects thrive—is more important than the letter. Editors must use their best judgment.
Why isn't "use common sense" an official policy? It doesn't need to be; as a fundamental principle, it is above any policy.
Good sense is of all things in the world the most equally distributed, for everybody thinks he is so well supplied with it that even those most difficult to please in all other matters never desire more of it than they already possess.
When advancing a position or justifying an action, base your argument on existing agreements, community foundation issues, and the interests of the encyclopedia, not your own common sense. Exhorting another editor to "just use common sense" is likely to be taken as insulting, for good reasons. If in a particular case you feel that literally following a rule harms the encyclopedia, or that doing something which the rules technically allow degrades it, then instead of telling someone who disagrees to use common sense, just focus on explaining why ignoring the rules will improve Wikipedia in that instance.
Be careful about citing this principle too aggressively. While it's quite acceptable to explain your own actions by saying, "it seemed like common sense to me", you should be careful not to imply that other editors are lacking in common sense, which may be seen as uncivil. Wikipedians come from diverse ethnic, religious, political, cultural and ideological backgrounds and have vastly different perceptions. Other editors are likely to ascribe very different meanings and values to words and concepts than you, so try to state your arguments as fully as possible. Citing concrete policies and guidelines is likely to be more effective than simply citing "common sense" and leaving it at that.
Andaikan Anda punya satu ide…
Rules are mostly made to be broken and are too often for the lazy to hide behind.
By all means break the rules, and break them beautifully, deliberately and well. That is one of the ends for which they exist.
Ces règles ne sont que des barrières pour empêcher les enfants de tomber.
Give me the judgment of balanced minds in preference to laws every time. Codes and manuals create patterned behavior. All patterned behavior tends to go unquestioned, gathering destructive momentum.
Pedantry and mastery are opposite attitudes toward rules. To apply a rule to the letter, rigidly, unquestioningly, in cases where it fits and in cases where it does not fit, is pedantry... To apply a rule with natural ease, with judgment, noticing the cases where it fits, and without ever letting the words of the rule obscure the purpose of the action or the opportunities of the situation, is mastery.
A society which is based on the letter of the law and never reaches any higher is taking very scarce advantage of the high level of human possibilities.
Le bon sens est la chose du monde la mieux partagée; car chacun pense en être si bien pourvu, que ceux même qui sont les plus difficiles à contenter en toute autre chose n'ont point coutume d'en désirer plus qu'ils en ont.