Knowledge Base Wiki

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Greece Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Mythology Low‑importance This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Television Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. New Zealand Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Television Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by American television task force (assessed as Low-importance).

This page is probably the worst example of overly detailed, speculative, non cited, and nonobjective fanwank I have ever read on Wikipedia. It has the tone and vocabulary of a 13 year old fangirl's love letter to the greatness of Ryan Gosling, while whining about the evil Fox Kid's executives horrible and unfair cancellation of her favorite show. This entry, as it stands now, should be more accurately titled "Ryan Gosling is SO cute but Fox Kid's hates him so much they almost made him quit acting and it's all so unfair," instead of Young Hercules. If I knew, or cared, anything about the subject matter I'd try to clean it up myself, but I'm afraid that my IQ dropped several points just from reading this thing in the first place. RyokoMocha (talk) 22:44, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As amusing as this article was, I cleaned it up significantly. It still needs a little help, but the major fanwank issues have been removed. DFS (talk) 23:35, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Writing to you years later, I think you mean that it is the best example of all the terrible things you listed. By saying that it is the worst example of terrible styles, that meant it was the best and you loved it. Taram (talk) 01:56, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]