Knowledge Base Wiki

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Football: England Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the English football task force (assessed as Low-importance). Hampshire Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hampshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hampshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HampshireWikipedia:WikiProject HampshireTemplate:WikiProject HampshireHampshire Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

I have already once reverted edits about the objections to the building of Stoneham. For a start, I don't think an article on The Dell is the place for them (perhaps the history of SFC is), but moreover the reference does not support the claim and as far as I remember having a team from Southampton in Eastleigh was not a reason the development fell through. I don't wish to start an edit war, so would someone else mind taking a look at the situation and deciding whether or not I am right? Thanks Dan K 22:02, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As always, the truth of these matters is never so simple. I recall that at the time Stoneham was proposed there were objections from Eastleigh residents although I felt that they were totally irrational bearing in mind the distance between the stadium site and the town centre and the minor fact that the M27 separated the two. The main reason for Stoneham's failure was local party politics. The site straddled the boundary between Southampton (Labour controlled) and Eastleigh (Lib-Dem), but the planning authority was Hampshire County Council (Conservative). The situation was neatly summed up in Dave Juson & David Bull's book "Full Time at The Dell":

I think it's rather ironic that since the Stoneham project was axed, the community football pitches have been abandoned, the site is now semi-derelict, often occupied by travellers and Hampshire County Council have tried desperately to offload it. Politicians - don't you just love them! Daemonic Kangaroo 05:00, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's how I remember it - the three councils all being controlled by different parties and just going around in circles about it. I certainly don't recall that fact that Eastleigh residents were unhappy a team from a different city would be 'in' their town. I'm going to remove the edit, and replace it with something ref'd from Full Time at The Dell when I get the full details of the ref (rather than just the book title) when I dig my copy out later on over the weekend. Any problems with this, let me know. Dan K 10:08, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]