Knowledge Base Wiki

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Cities This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles California: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 14:08, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What would you call a small mountain range like Potrero Hills?
This is regarding a dispute on the wording of navegation disambiguation tag at the top of the similarly named neighborhood Potrero Hill, San Francisco, California. It's sloppy to say for the potrero hills see potrero hills, but one user believes that it should not state, the minor mountain range see potero hills, because they don't count as a minor mountain range, so is there some other term which could be found mutually agreeable. hill range? minor range?Boomgaylove (talk) 04:39, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Certainly the word moutain does not spring to mind if that is where you are talking about. I would have thought range would be used to describe huge area. For the disambigution why not just say See Potrero Hills for East Bay Regional Park? David D. (Talk) 05:42, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

what east bay regional park??Boomgaylove (talk) 13:26, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

All parks in the East Bay are managed by the Easy Bat Regional Park district. I assume this one is too? I could be wrong. David D. (Talk) 17:20, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Apparently its not one of their parks. http://www.ebparks.org/parks David D. (Talk) 17:38, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

I see the disambiguation at Potrero Hill, San Francisco, California currently reads For the Potrero Hills in Richmond, California, see Potrero Hills. What's wrong with that? David D. (Talk) 05:48, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

It's redundant, and the first part where it says potrero hills, in the {{Other|what it is|article title}} format is not within precedent or commom usage of that template.Boomgaylove (talk) 13:26, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

You don't have to use the template. David D. (Talk) 17:20, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

How about "bluffs"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Boomgaylove (talk • contribs) 13:27, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

The're not bluffs, the're hills. David D. (Talk) 17:20, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

I pasted the above from the ref desk since the discussion seems to be more appropriate and useful here. David D. (Talk) 18:05, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In response to "The're not bluffs, the're hills"

Neither are they mountains. They're exactly what the article says they are: a range of low hills. Period. Enough agonizing over wording. [Added to discussion after this was pasted here.] +ILike2BeAnonymous (talk) 18:15, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Potrero Hill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080113182257/http://www.sfweekly.com:80/search/restaurants.php?cuisine=&price=&feature=&region=769930&regionGroup= to http://www.sfweekly.com/search/restaurants.php?regionGroup=&price=&feature=&cuisine=&region=769930

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:20, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Potrero Hill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.potreroview.net/news10034.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130708200033/http://www.potreroview.net/news10406.html to http://www.potreroview.net/news10406.html
• Added archive https://archive.is/20071019060848/http://www.7x7sf.com/home_design/real_estate/8496497.html to http://www.7x7sf.com/home_design/real_estate/8496497.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100517051759/http://www.potreroview.net/news10374.html to http://potreroview.net/news10374.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:25, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Looks far too much like real-estate treacle written to lure people to live or visit there. Please fix this so it better fits Wikipedia conventions instead of reading like an advertisement for a tour company. - Random User, 15 October 2019, 00:01 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.193.149.162 (talk)

I agree. - Hunan201p (talk) 06:34, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I cleaned up some of the worst parts. Regards, HaeB (talk) 05:13, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://books.google.com/books?id=1dF1DwAAQBAJ&pg=PT35&lpg=PT35

I'm looking for a better source than this. Please drop one here when you find it. Potrero Hills is a neighborhood of single adults. People with kids, especially more than one kid, are extremely rare. The description of Potrero Hills as a "family-oriented community" is an obscenity. - Hunan201p (talk) 06:34, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]