Knowledge Base Wiki

Search for LIMS content across all our Wiki Knowledge Bases.

Type a search term to find related articles by LIMS subject matter experts gathered from the most trusted and dynamic collaboration tools in the laboratory informatics industry.

A ground-penetrating radargram collected on a historic cemetery in Alabama, US. Hyperbolic arrivals (arrows) indicate the presence of diffractors buried beneath the surface, possibly associated with human burials. Reflections from soil layering are also present (dashed lines).

Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) is a geophysical method that uses radar pulses to image the subsurface. It is a non-intrusive method of surveying the sub-surface to investigate underground utilities such as concrete, asphalt, metals, pipes, cables or masonry.[1] This nondestructive method uses electromagnetic radiation in the microwave band (UHF/VHF frequencies) of the radio spectrum, and detects the reflected signals from subsurface structures. GPR can have applications in a variety of media, including rock, soil, ice, fresh water, pavements and structures. In the right conditions, practitioners can use GPR to detect subsurface objects, changes in material properties, and voids and cracks.[2][3]

GPR uses high-frequency (usually polarized) radio waves, usually in the range 10 MHz to 2.6 GHz. A GPR transmitter and antenna emits electromagnetic energy into the ground. When the energy encounters a buried object or a boundary between materials having different permittivities, it may be reflected or refracted or scattered back to the surface. A receiving antenna can then record the variations in the return signal. The principles involved are similar to seismology, except GPR methods implement electromagnetic energy rather than acoustic energy, and energy may be reflected at boundaries where subsurface electrical properties change rather than subsurface mechanical properties as is the case with seismic energy.

The electrical conductivity of the ground, the transmitted center frequency, and the radiated power all may limit the effective depth range of GPR investigation. Increases in electrical conductivity attenuate the introduced electromagnetic wave, and thus the penetration depth decreases. Because of frequency-dependent attenuation mechanisms, higher frequencies do not penetrate as far as lower frequencies. However, higher frequencies may provide improved resolution. Thus operating frequency is always a trade-off between resolution and penetration. Optimal depth of subsurface penetration is achieved in ice where the depth of penetration can achieve several thousand metres (to bedrock in Greenland) at low GPR frequencies. Dry sandy soils or massive dry materials such as granite, limestone, and concrete tend to be resistive rather than conductive, and the depth of penetration could be up to 15 metres (49 ft). However, in moist or clay-laden soils and materials with high electrical conductivity, penetration may be as little as a few centimetres.

Ground-penetrating radar antennas are generally in contact with the ground for the strongest signal strength; however, GPR air-launched antennas can be used above the ground.

Cross borehole GPR has developed within the field of hydrogeophysics to be a valuable means of assessing the presence and amount of soil water.

History

The first patent for a system designed to use continuous-wave radar to locate buried objects was submitted by Gotthelf Leimbach and Heinrich Löwy in 1910, six years after the first patent for radar itself (patent DE 237 944). A patent for a system using radar pulses rather than a continuous wave was filed in 1926 by Dr. Hülsenbeck (DE 489 434), leading to improved depth resolution. A glacier's depth was measured using ground penetrating radar in 1929 by W. Stern.[4]

Further developments in the field remained sparse until the 1970s, when military applications began driving research. Commercial applications followed and the first affordable consumer equipment was sold in 1975.[4]

In 1972, the Apollo 17 mission carried a ground penetrating radar called ALSE (Apollo Lunar Sounder Experiment) in orbit around the Moon. It was able to record depth information up to 1.3 km and recorded the results on film due to the lack of suitable computer storage at the time.[5][6]

Applications

Ground penetrating radar in use near Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA in 2010
Ground penetrating radar survey of an archaeological site in Jordan

GPR has many applications in a number of fields. In the Earth sciences it is used to study bedrock, soils, groundwater, and ice. It is of some utility in prospecting for gold nuggets and for diamonds in alluvial gravel beds, by finding natural traps in buried stream beds that have the potential for accumulating heavier particles.[7] The Chinese lunar rover Yutu has a GPR on its underside to investigate the soil and crust of the Moon.

Engineering applications include nondestructive testing (NDT) of structures and pavements, locating buried structures and utility lines, and studying soils and bedrock. In environmental remediation, GPR is used to define landfills, contaminant plumes, and other remediation sites, while in archaeology it is used for mapping archaeological features and cemeteries. GPR is used in law enforcement for locating clandestine graves and buried evidence. Military uses include detection of mines, unexploded ordnance, and tunnels.

Borehole radars utilizing GPR are used to map the structures from a borehole in underground mining applications. Modern directional borehole radar systems are able to produce three-dimensional images from measurements in a single borehole.[8]

One of the other main applications for ground-penetrating radars is for locating underground utilities. Standard electromagnetic induction utility locating tools require utilities to be conductive. These tools are ineffective for locating plastic conduits or concrete storm and sanitary sewers. Since GPR detects variations in dielectric properties in the subsurface, it can be highly effective for locating non-conductive utilities.

GPR was often used on the Channel 4 television programme Time Team which used the technology to determine a suitable area for examination by means of excavations. GPR was also used to recover £150,000 in cash ransom that Michael Sams had buried in a field, following his 1992 kidnapping of an estate agent.[9]

Military

Military applications of ground-penetrating radar include detection of unexploded ordnance and detecting tunnels. In military applications and other common GPR applications, practitioners often use GPR in conjunction with other available geophysical techniques such as electrical resistivity and electromagnetic induction methods.

In May 2020, the U.S. military ordered ground-penetrating radar system from Chemring Sensors and Electronics Systems (CSES), to detect improvised explosive devices (IEDs) buried in roadways, in $200.2 million deal.[10]

Vehicle localization

A recent novel approach to vehicle localization using prior map based images from ground penetrating radar has been demonstrated. Termed "Localizing Ground Penetrating Radar" (LGPR), centimeter level accuracies at speeds up to 100 km/h (60 mph) have been demonstrated.[11] Closed-loop operation was first demonstrated in 2012 for autonomous vehicle steering and fielded for military operation in 2013.[11] Highway speed centimeter-level localization during a night-time snow-storm was demonstrated in 2016.[12][13] This technology was exclusively licensed and commercialized for vehicle safety in ADAS and Autonomous Vehicle positioning and lane-keeping systems by GPR Inc. and marketed as Ground Positioning Radar(tm).

Archaeology

Ground penetrating radar survey is one method used in archaeological geophysics. GPR can be used to detect and map subsurface archaeological artifacts, features, and patterning.[14]

GPR depth slices showing a crypt in a historic cemetery. These planview maps show subsurface structures at different depths. Sixty lines of data – individually representing vertical profiles – were collected and assembled as a 3-dimensional data array that can be horizontally "sliced" at different depths.)
GPR depth section (profile) showing a single line of data from the survey of the historic crypt shown above. The domed roof of the crypt can be seen between 1 and 2.5 meters below surface.

The concept of radar is familiar to most people. With ground penetrating radar, the radar signal – an electromagnetic pulse – is directed into the ground. Subsurface objects and stratigraphy (layering) will cause reflections that are picked up by a receiver. The travel time of the reflected signal indicates the depth. Data may be plotted as profiles, as planview maps isolating specific depths, or as three-dimensional models.

GPR can be a powerful tool in favorable conditions (uniform sandy soils are ideal). Like other geophysical methods used in archaeology (and unlike excavation) it can locate artifacts and map features without any risk of damaging them. Among methods used in archaeological geophysics, it is unique both in its ability to detect some small objects at relatively great depths, and in its ability to distinguish the depth of anomaly sources.

The principal disadvantage of GPR is that it is severely limited by less-than-ideal environmental conditions. Fine-grained sediments (clays and silts) are often problematic because their high electrical conductivity causes loss of signal strength; rocky or heterogeneous sediments scatter the GPR signal, weakening the useful signal while increasing extraneous noise.

In the field of cultural heritage GPR with high frequency antenna is also used for investigating historical masonry structures, detecting cracks and decay patterns of columns and detachment of frescoes.[15]

Burial sites

GPR is used by criminologists, historians, and archaeologists to search burial sites.[16] In his publication, Interpreting Ground-penetrating Radar for Archaeology, Lawrence Conyers, one of the first archaeological specialists in GPR, described the process.[17] Conyers published research using GPR in El Salvador in 1996,[18] in the Four Corners region Chaco period in southern Arizona in 1997,[19][20] and in a medieval site in Ireland in 2018.[21] Informed by Conyer's research,[17] the Institute of Prairie and Indigenous Archaeology at the University of Alberta, in collaboration with the National Centre for Truth and Reconciliation, have been using GPR in their survey of Indian Residential Schools in Canada.[22] By June 2021, the Institute had used GPR to locate suspected unmarked graves in areas near historic cemeteries and Indian Residential Schools.[22] On May 27, 2021, it was reported that 215 unmarked anomalies (possibly children's graves) were found using GPR at a burial site at the Kamloops Indian Residential School on Tk’emlúps te Secwépemc First Nation land in British Columbia.[23] In June 2021, GPR technology was used by the Cowessess First Nation in Saskatchewan to locate 751 unmarked gravesites on the Marieval Indian Residential School site, which had been in operation for a century until it was closed down in 1996.[24]

Advancements in GPR technology integrated with various 3D software modelling platforms generate three-dimensional reconstructions of subsurface "shapes and their spatial relationships". By 2021, this has been "emerging as the new standard".[25]

Glaciology

This section is an excerpt from Radioglaciology.[]

Radioglaciology is the study of glaciers, ice sheets, ice caps and icy moons using ice penetrating radar. It employs a geophysical method similar to ground-penetrating radar and typically operates at frequencies in the MF, HF, VHF and UHF portions of the radio spectrum.[26][27][28][29] This technique is also commonly referred to as "Ice Penetrating Radar (IPR)" or "Radio Echo Sounding (RES)".

Glaciers are particularly well suited to investigation by radar because the conductivity, imaginary part of the permittivity, and the dielectric absorption of ice are small at radio frequencies resulting in low loss tangent, skin depth, and attenuation values. This allows echoes from the base of the ice sheet to be detected through ice thicknesses greater than 4 km.[30][31] The subsurface observation of ice masses using radio waves has been an integral and evolving geophysical technique in glaciology for over half a century.[32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] Its most widespread uses have been the measurement of ice thickness, subglacial topography, and ice sheet stratigraphy.[40][33][30] It has also been used to observe the subglacial and conditions of ice sheets and glaciers, including hydrology, thermal state, accumulation, flow history, ice fabric, and bed geology.[26] In planetary science, ice penetrating radar has also been used to explore the subsurface of the Polar Ice Caps on Mars and comets.[41][42][43] Missions are planned to explore the icy moons of Jupiter.[44][45]

Three-dimensional imaging

Individual lines of GPR data represent a sectional (profile) view of the subsurface. Multiple lines of data systematically collected over an area may be used to construct three-dimensional or tomographic images. Data may be presented as three-dimensional blocks, or as horizontal or vertical slices. Horizontal slices (known as "depth slices" or "time slices") are essentially planview maps isolating specific depths. Time-slicing has become standard practice in archaeological applications, because horizontal patterning is often the most important indicator of cultural activities.[20]

Limitations

The most significant performance limitation of GPR is in high-conductivity materials such as clay soils and soils that are salt contaminated. Performance is also limited by signal scattering in heterogeneous conditions (e.g. rocky soils).

Other disadvantages of currently available GPR systems include:

  • Interpretation of radar-grams is generally non-intuitive to the novice.
  • Considerable expertise is necessary to effectively design, conduct, and interpret GPR surveys.
  • Relatively high energy consumption can be problematic for extensive field surveys.

Radar is sensitive to changes in material composition; detecting changes requires movement. When looking through stationary items using surface-penetrating or ground-penetrating radar, the equipment needs to be moved in order for the radar to examine the specified area by looking for differences in material composition. While it can identify items such as pipes, voids, and soil, it cannot identify the specific materials, such as gold and precious gems. It can, however, be useful in providing subsurface mapping of potential gem-bearing pockets, or "vugs". The readings can be confused by moisture in the ground and they can't separate gem-bearing pockets from non-gem-bearing ones.[46]

When determining depth capabilities, the frequency range of the antenna dictates the size of the antenna and the depth capability. The grid spacing which is scanned is based on the size of the targets that need to be identified and the results required. Typical grid spacings can be 1 meter, 3 ft, 5 ft, 10 ft, 20 ft for ground surveys, and for walls and floors 1 inch–1 ft.

The speed at which a radar signal travels is dependent upon the composition of the material being penetrated. The depth to a target is determined based on the amount of time it takes for the radar signal to reflect back to the unit’s antenna. Radar signals travel at different velocities through different types of materials. It is possible to use the depth to a known object to determine a specific velocity and then calibrate the depth calculations.

Power regulation

In 2005, the European Telecommunications Standards Institute introduced legislation to regulate GPR equipment and GPR operators to control excess emissions of electromagnetic radiation.[47] The European GPR association (EuroGPR) was formed as a trade association to represent and protect the legitimate use of GPR in Europe.

Similar technologies

Enhanced ground imaging and bomb detection

Ground-penetrating radar uses a variety of technologies to generate the radar signal: these are impulse,[48] stepped frequency, frequency-modulated continuous-wave (FMCW), and noise. Systems on the market in 2009 also use Digital signal processing (DSP) to process the data during survey work rather than off-line.

A special kind of GPR uses unmodulated continuous-wave signals. This holographic subsurface radar differs from other GPR types in that it records plan-view subsurface holograms. Depth penetration of this kind of radar is rather small (20–30 cm), but lateral resolution is enough to discriminate different types of landmines in the soil, or cavities, defects, bugging devices, or other hidden objects in walls, floors, and structural elements.[49][50]

GPR is used on vehicles for high-speed road survey and landmine detection. EU Detect Force Technology, an advanced soil research company, design utilizes X6 Plus Grounding Radar (XGR) as an hybrid GPR application for military mine detection and also police bomb detection. The "Mineseeker Project" seeks to design a system to determine whether landmines are present in areas using ultra wideband synthetic aperture radar units mounted on blimps.

Utility lines

In Pipe-Penetrating Radar (IPPR) and In Sewer GPR (ISGPR) are applications of GPR technologies applied in non-metallic-pipes where the signals are directed through pipe and conduit walls to detect pipe wall thickness and voids behind the pipe walls.[51][52][53]

SewerVUE Technology, an advanced pipe condition assessment company utilizes Pipe Penetrating Radar (PPR) as an in pipe GPR application to see remaining wall thickness, rebar cover, delamination, and detect the presence of voids developing outside the pipe.

Wall-penetrating radar

Wall-penetrating radar can read through non-metallic structures as demonstrated for the first time by ASIO and Australian Police in 1984 while surveying an ex Russian Embassy in Canberra. Police showed how to watch people up to two rooms away laterally and through floors vertically, could see metal lumps that might be weapons; GPR can even act as a motion sensor for military guards and police.

See also

References

  1. ^ "How Ground Penetrating Radar Works". Tech27. Archived from the original on 23 November 2021. Retrieved 24 September 2020.
  2. ^ Srivastav, A.; Nguyen, P.; McConnell, M.; Loparo, K. N.; Mandal, S. (October 2020). "A Highly Digital Multiantenna Ground-Penetrating Radar System". IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement. 69 (10): 7422–7436. Bibcode:2020ITIM...69.7422S. doi:10.1109/TIM.2020.2984415. S2CID 216338273.
  3. ^ Daniels DJ (2004). Ground Penetrating Radar (2nd ed.). Knoval (Institution of Engineering and Technology). pp. 1–4. ISBN 978-0-86341-360-5.
  4. ^ a b "History of Ground Penetrating Radar Technology". Ingenieurbüro obonic. Archived from the original on 2 February 2017. Retrieved 13 February 2016.
  5. ^ "The Apollo Lunar Sounder Radar System" - Proceedings of the IEEE, June 1974
  6. ^ "Lunar Sounder Experiment". Lunar and Planetary Institute (LPI). Apollo 17 Experiments. Retrieved 24 June 2021.
  7. ^ Wilson, M. G. C.; Henry, G.; Marshall, T. R. (2006). "A review of the alluvial diamond industry and the gravels of the North West Province, South Africa" (PDF). South African Journal of Geology. 109 (3): 301–314. Bibcode:2006SAJG..109..301W. doi:10.2113/gssajg.109.3.301. Archived (PDF) from the original on 5 July 2013. Retrieved 9 December 2012.
  8. ^ Hofinghoff, Jan-Florian (2013). "Resistive Loaded Antenna for Ground Penetrating Radar Inside a Bottom Hole Assembly". IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation. 61 (12): 6201–6205. Bibcode:2013ITAP...61.6201H. doi:10.1109/TAP.2013.2283604. S2CID 43083872.
  9. ^ Birmingham Mail
  10. ^ "Army orders ground-penetrating radar system from CSES for detecting hidden IEDs in $200.2 million deal". Military & Aerospace Electronics. 13 May 2020.
  11. ^ a b Cornick, Matthew; Koechling, Jeffrey; Stanley, Byron; Zhang, Beijia (1 January 2016). "Localizing ground penetrating RADAR: A step toward robust autonomous ground vehicle localization". Journal of Field Robotics. 33 (1): 82–102. doi:10.1002/rob.21605. ISSN 1556-4967.
  12. ^ Enabling autonomous vehicles to drive in the snow with localizing ground penetrating radar (video). MIT Lincoln Laboratory. 24 June 2016. Archived from the original on 19 January 2017. Retrieved 31 May 2017 – via YouTube.
  13. ^ "MIT Lincoln Laboratory: News: Lincoln Laboratory demonstrates highly accurate vehicle localization under adverse weather conditions". www.ll.mit.edu. Archived from the original on 31 May 2017. Retrieved 31 May 2017.
  14. ^ Lowe, Kelsey M; Wallis, Lynley A.; Pardoe, Colin; Marwick, Benjamin; Clarkson, Christopher J; Manne, Tiina; Smith, M.A.; Fullagar, Richard (2014). "Ground-penetrating radar and burial practices in western Arnhem Land, Australia". Archaeology in Oceania. 49 (3): 148–157. doi:10.1002/arco.5039.
  15. ^ Masini, N; Persico, R; Rizzo, E (2010). "Some examples of GPR prospecting for monitoring of the monumental heritage". Journal of Geophysics and Engineering. 7 (2): 190. Bibcode:2010JGE.....7..190M. doi:10.1088/1742-2132/7/2/S05.
  16. ^ Mazurkiewicz, Ewelina; Tadeusiewicz, Ryszard; Tomecka-Suchoń, Sylwia (20 October 2016). "Application of Neural Network Enhanced Ground-Penetrating Radar to Localization of Burial Sites". Applied Artificial Intelligence. 30 (9): 844–860. doi:10.1080/08839514.2016.1274250. ISSN 0883-9514. S2CID 36779388. Retrieved 24 June 2021.
  17. ^ a b Conyers, Lawrence B. (1 April 2014) [2013]. Interpreting Ground-penetrating Radar for Archaeology. Routledge & CRC Press. p. 220. ISBN 9781611322170. Retrieved 24 June 2021.
  18. ^ Conyers, Lawrence (1 October 1996). "Archaeological evidence for dating the Loma Caldera eruption, Ceren, El Salvador". Geoarchaeology. 11 (5): 377–391. Bibcode:1996Gearc..11..377C. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6548(199610)11:5<377::AID-GEA1>3.0.CO;2-5.
  19. ^ Conyers, Lawrence B. (1 September 2006). "Ground-Penetrating Radar Techniques to Discover and Map Historic Graves". Historical Archaeology. 40 (3): 64–73. doi:10.1007/BF03376733. ISSN 2328-1103. S2CID 31432686. Retrieved 24 June 2021.
  20. ^ a b Conyers, Lawrence B; Goodman, Dean (1997). Ground-penetrating radar: an introduction for archaeologists. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press. ISBN 978-0-7619-8927-1. OCLC 36817059.
  21. ^ Conyers, Lawrence B. (2018). "Medieval Site in Ireland". Ground-penetrating Radar and Magnetometry for Buried Landscape Analysis. SpringerBriefs in Geography. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 75–90. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-70890-4_7. ISBN 978-3-319-70890-4. Retrieved 24 June 2021.
  22. ^ a b Wadsworth, William T. D. (22 July 2020). "Geophysics and Unmarked Graves: a Short Introduction for Communities". ArcGIS StoryMaps. Retrieved 24 June 2021.
  23. ^ "Remains of 215 children found at former residential school in B.C." The Canadian Press via APTN News. 28 May 2021. Retrieved 4 June 2021.
  24. ^ "Saskatchewan First Nation discovers hundreds of unmarked graves at former residential school site". CTV News. 23 June 2021. Retrieved 24 June 2021.
  25. ^ Kelly, T. B.; Angel, M. N.; O’Connor, D. E.; Huff, C. C.; Morris, L.; Wach, G. D. (22 June 2021). "A novel approach to 3D modelling ground-penetrating radar (GPR) data – a case study of a cemetery and applications for criminal investigation". Forensic Science International. 325: 110882. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.110882. ISSN 0379-0738. PMID 34182205. S2CID 235673352.
  26. ^ a b Schroeder, Dustin M.; Bingham, Robert G.; Blankenship, Donald D.; Christianson, Knut; Eisen, Olaf; Flowers, Gwenn E.; Karlsson, Nanna B.; Koutnik, Michelle R.; Paden, John D.; Siegert, Martin J. (April 2020). "Five decades of radioglaciology". Annals of Glaciology. 61 (81): 1–13. Bibcode:2020AnGla..61....1S. doi:10.1017/aog.2020.11. ISSN 0260-3055.
  27. ^ Kulessa, B.; Booth, A. D.; Hobbs, A.; Hubbard, A. L. (18 December 2008). "Automated monitoring of subglacial hydrological processes with ground-penetrating radar (GPR) at high temporal resolution: scope and potential pitfalls". Geophysical Research Letters. 35 (24): L24502. Bibcode:2008GeoRL..3524502K. doi:10.1029/2008GL035855. hdl:2160/7032. ISSN 0094-8276.
  28. ^ Bogorodsky, VV; Bentley, CR; Gudmandsen, PE (1985). Radioglaciology. D. Reidel Publishing.
  29. ^ Pellikka, Petri; Rees, W. Gareth, eds. (16 December 2009). Remote Sensing of Glaciers: Techniques for Topographic, Spatial and Thematic Mapping of Glaciers (0 ed.). CRC Press. doi:10.1201/b10155. ISBN 978-0-429-20642-9. S2CID 129205832.
  30. ^ a b Bamber, J. L.; Griggs, J. A.; Hurkmans, R. T. W. L.; Dowdeswell, J. A.; Gogineni, S. P.; Howat, I.; Mouginot, J.; Paden, J.; Palmer, S.; Rignot, E.; Steinhage, D. (22 March 2013). "A new bed elevation dataset for Greenland". The Cryosphere. 7 (2): 499–510. Bibcode:2013TCry....7..499B. doi:10.5194/tc-7-499-2013. hdl:1808/18762. ISSN 1994-0424.
  31. ^ Fretwell, P.; Pritchard, H. D.; Vaughan, D. G.; Bamber, J. L.; Barrand, N. E.; et al. (28 February 2013). "Bedmap2: improved ice bed, surface and thickness datasets for Antarctica" (PDF). The Cryosphere. 7 (1): 390. Bibcode:2013TCry....7..375F. doi:10.5194/tc-7-375-2013. Retrieved 6 January 2014.
  32. ^ Allen, Christopher (26 September 2008). "A Brief History Of Radio – Echo Sounding Of Ice".
  33. ^ a b Dowdeswell, J A; Evans, S (1 October 2004). "Investigations of the form and flow of ice sheets and glaciers using radio-echo sounding". Reports on Progress in Physics. 67 (10): 1821–1861. Bibcode:2004RPPh...67.1821D. doi:10.1088/0034-4885/67/10/R03. ISSN 0034-4885. S2CID 250845954.
  34. ^ Drewry, DJ (1983). Antarctica: Glaciological and Geophysical Folio, Vol. 2. University of Cambridge, Scott Polar Research Institute Cambridge.
  35. ^ Gudmandsen, P. (December 1969). "Airborne Radio Echo Sounding of the Greenland Ice Sheet". The Geographical Journal. 135 (4): 548–551. Bibcode:1969GeogJ.135..548G. doi:10.2307/1795099. JSTOR 1795099.
  36. ^ Robin, G. de Q. (1975). "Radio-Echo Sounding: Glaciological Interpretations and Applications". Journal of Glaciology. 15 (73): 49–64. doi:10.3189/S0022143000034262. ISSN 0022-1430.
  37. ^ Steenson, BO (1951). Radar Methods for the Exploration of Glaciers (PhD). California Institute of Technology.
  38. ^ Stern, W (1930). Principles, methods and results of electrodynamic thickness measurement of glacier ice. Zeitschrift für Gletscherkunde 18, 24.
  39. ^ Turchetti, Simone; Dean, Katrina; Naylor, Simon; Siegert, Martin (September 2008). "Accidents and opportunities: a history of the radio echo-sounding of Antarctica, 1958–79". The British Journal for the History of Science. 41 (3): 417–444. doi:10.1017/S0007087408000903. hdl:1842/2975. ISSN 0007-0874. S2CID 55339188.
  40. ^ Bingham, R. G.; Siegert, M. J. (1 March 2007). "Radio-Echo Sounding Over Polar Ice Masses". Journal of Environmental & Engineering Geophysics. 12 (1): 47–62. Bibcode:2007JEEG...12...47B. doi:10.2113/JEEG12.1.47. hdl:2164/11013. ISSN 1083-1363.
  41. ^ Picardi, G. (23 December 2005). "Radar Soundings of the Subsurface of Mars". Science. 310 (5756): 1925–1928. Bibcode:2005Sci...310.1925P. doi:10.1126/science.1122165. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 16319122.
  42. ^ Kofman, W.; Herique, A.; Barbin, Y.; Barriot, J.-P.; Ciarletti, V.; Clifford, S.; Edenhofer, P.; Elachi, C.; Eyraud, C.; Goutail, J.-P.; Heggy, E. (31 July 2015). "Properties of the 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko interior revealed by CONSERT radar". Science. 349 (6247): aab0639. Bibcode:2015Sci...349b0639K. doi:10.1126/science.aab0639. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 26228153.
  43. ^ Seu, Roberto; Phillips, Roger J.; Biccari, Daniela; Orosei, Roberto; Masdea, Arturo; Picardi, Giovanni; Safaeinili, Ali; Campbell, Bruce A.; Plaut, Jeffrey J.; Marinangeli, Lucia; Smrekar, Suzanne E. (18 May 2007). "SHARAD sounding radar on the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter". Journal of Geophysical Research. 112 (E5): E05S05. Bibcode:2007JGRE..112.5S05S. doi:10.1029/2006JE002745. ISSN 0148-0227.
  44. ^ Blankenship, DD (2018). "Reasons for Europa". 42nd COSPAR Scientific Assembly. 42. and 5 others.
  45. ^ Bruzzone, L; Alberti, G; Catallo, C; Ferro, A; Kofman, W; Orosei, R (May 2011). "Subsurface Radar Sounding of the Jovian Moon Ganymede". Proceedings of the IEEE. 99 (5): 837–857. doi:10.1109/JPROC.2011.2108990. ISSN 0018-9219. S2CID 12738030.
  46. ^ "Gems and Technology – Vision Underground". The Ganoksin Project. Archived from the original on 22 February 2014. Retrieved 5 February 2014.
  47. ^ Electromagnetic compatibility and Radio spectrum Matters (ERM). Code of Practice in respect of the control, use and application of Ground Probing Radar (GPR) and Wall Probing Radar (WPR) systems and equipment. European Telecommunications Standards Institute. September 2009. ETSI EG 202 730 V1.1.1.
  48. ^ "An impulse generator for the ground penetrating radar" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 18 April 2015. Retrieved 25 March 2013.
  49. ^ Zhuravlev, A.V.; Ivashov, S.I.; Razevig, V.V.; Vasiliev, I.A.; Türk, A.S.; Kizilay, A. (2013). "Holographic subsurface imaging radar for applications in civil engineering" (PDF). IET International Radar Conference 2013. IET International Radar Conference. Xi'an, China: IET. p. 0065. doi:10.1049/cp.2013.0111. ISBN 978-1-84919-603-1. Archived (PDF) from the original on 29 September 2013. Retrieved 26 September 2013.
  50. ^ Ivashov, S. I.; Razevig, V. V.; Vasiliev, I. A.; Zhuravlev, A. V.; Bechtel, T. D.; Capineri, L. (2011). "Holographic Subsurface Radar of RASCAN Type: Development and Application" (PDF). IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing. 4 (4): 763–778. Bibcode:2011IJSTA...4..763I. doi:10.1109/JSTARS.2011.2161755. S2CID 12663279. Archived (PDF) from the original on 29 September 2013. Retrieved 26 September 2013.
  51. ^ "Ground Penetrating Radar(GPR) Systems – Murphysurveys". www.murphysurveys.co.uk. Archived from the original on 10 September 2017. Retrieved 10 September 2017.
  52. ^ Ékes, C.; Neducza, B.; Takacs, P. (2014). Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar. pp. 368–371. doi:10.1109/ICGPR.2014.6970448. ISBN 978-1-4799-6789-6. S2CID 22956188.
  53. ^ "International No-Dig Meets in Singapore - Trenchless Technology Magazine". Trenchless Technology Magazine. 30 December 2010. Retrieved 10 September 2017.
  • Jaufer, Rakeeb M., Amine Ihamouten, Yann Goyat, Shreedhar S. Todkar, David Guilbert, Ali Assaf, and Xavier Dérobert. 2022. "A Preliminary Numerical Study to Compare the Physical Method and Machine Learning Methods Applied to GPR Data for Underground Utility Network Characterization" Remote Sensing 14, no. 4: 1047. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14041047

Further reading

An overview of scientific and engineering applications can be found in:

  • Jol, H. M., ed. (2008). Ground Penetrating Radar Theory and Applications. Elsevier.
  • Persico, Raffaele (2014). Introduction to ground penetrating radar: inverse scattering and data processing. John Wiley & Sons.

A general overview of geophysical methods in archaeology can be found in the following works:

  • Clark, Anthony J. (1996). Seeing Beneath the Soil. Prospecting Methods in Archaeology. London, United Kingdom: B.T. Batsford Ltd.
  • Conyers, Lawrence B; Goodman, Dean (1997). Ground-penetrating radar: an introduction for archaeologists. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press. ISBN 978-0-7619-8927-1. OCLC 36817059.
  • Gaffney, Chris; John Gater (2003). Revealing the Buried Past: Geophysics for Archaeologists. Stroud, United Kingdom: Tempus.

source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ground_Penetrating_Radar