Knowledge Base Wiki

Search for LIMS content across all our Wiki Knowledge Bases.

Type a search term to find related articles by LIMS subject matter experts gathered from the most trusted and dynamic collaboration tools in the laboratory informatics industry.

Dalisi
Chinese name
Chinese大理寺
Transcriptions
Standard Mandarin
Hanyu Pinyindà lǐ sì
Wade–GilesTa4 Li3 Ssu4
Vietnamese name
VietnameseĐại lý tự
Manchu name
Manchu scriptᠪᡝᡳᡩᡝᠨ ᠪᡝ
ᡨᡠᠸᠠᠨᠴᡳᡥᡳᠶᠠᡵᠠ
ᠶᠠᠮᡠᠨ
Möllendorffbeiden be tuwancihiyara yamun

Dalisi[1] (大理寺; variously interpreted as the Court of Judicature and Revision,[2] the Court of Judicial Review,[3] and the Office of Justice[4]) was the central government's judicial body in ancient China responsible for handling criminal cases.[5][6] It was also referred to as Jisi (棘寺) because interrogations of criminals sometimes took place under thorn trees.[7] Ancient Vietnam followed ancient China's precedent and also established a similar institution.

References

  1. ^ "The Relationship of "Humanity, Reason and Law" with Chinese Legal Traditions" (PDF). Shenyang Normal University. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2024-09-13. Retrieved 2024-11-17.
  2. ^ Wickes, Dean R. WickesDean R. (2019-10-24), "WANG Yongji", Eminent Chinese of the Qing Period, Berkshire Publishing Group, doi:10.1093/acref/9780190088019.001.0001/acref-9780190088019-e-699, ISBN 978-1-61472-033-1, retrieved 2024-11-17
  3. ^ "From the Imperial Capital to the Magistrate's Court: Judicial Practices in Imperial China". academic.oup.com. Retrieved 2024-11-17.
  4. ^ "CONTRACTS AS TOOLS TO PROMOTE MORALITY AND SOCIAL ORDER: THE TANG DYNASTY'S REGULATION OF CONTRACTUAL RELATIONSHIPS" (PDF). Tsinghua China Law Review. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2024-11-17. Retrieved 2024-11-17.
  5. ^ 北宋·王讜，《唐語林》（卷8）：“大理則於棘下訊鞫其罪，所謂‘大司寇聽刑於棘木之下’。”
  6. ^ "古代大理寺名称及职能的演变 – 北京政法网". www.bj148.org. Archived from the original on 2024-11-17. Retrieved 2024-11-17.
  7. ^ 南宋·徐夢莘，《三朝北盟會編》（卷207）：“初，飛在大理寺獄，未肯招狀，先是飛自郾陵回軍也，在一村寺中，與王貴、張憲、董先、王俊夜坐，移時不語，忽作聲曰：‘天下事竟如何？’眾皆不敢應，唯憲徐言曰：‘在相公處置耳。’既退，俊握先及貴手曰：‘太尉，太尉聞適來相公之言及張太尉之對否？’先與貴曰：‘然。’及俊告飛使子雲通書軍中事，因言郾陵路中之語，舊校云：王俊首武穆反狀，《揮塵餘話》載之最詳，追先赴行在，秦檜與先曰：‘止是有一句言語要爾爲證，證了只今日便可出。’仍差大理官二人送先赴大理寺，並命證畢，就今日摘出，繇是先下大理寺對吏，即伏，吏問飛，飛猶不伏，有獄子事飛甚謹，至是獄子倚門斜立無恭謹之狀，飛異之，獄子忽然而言曰：‘我平生以岳飛爲忠臣，故伏侍甚謹，不敢少慢，今乃逆臣耳！’飛聞之，請問其故，獄子曰：‘君臣不可疑，疑則爲亂，故君疑臣則誅，臣疑君則反，若臣疑於君不反，復爲君疑而誅之，若君疑於臣而不誅，則復疑於君而必反。君今疑臣矣，故送下棘寺，豈有復出之理？死故無疑矣！少保若不死出獄，則復疑於君，安得不反？反既明甚，此所以爲逆臣也！’”
source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Court_of_Judicature_and_Revision