Infrastructure tools to support an effective radiation oncology learning health system

Posted on May 13, 2024 By LabLynx Journal articles

Vasculature of porcine skin under fluorescence (Smooth muscle actin with AlexaFluor 488). Green = smooth muscle actin (SMA) with Alexa 488 fluorophore. Blue = DAPI counterstain. Red = auto-fluorescence.

Immunofluorescence (IF) is a light microscopy-based technique that allows detection and localization of a wide variety of target biomolecules within a cell or tissue at a quantitative level. The technique utilizes the binding specificity of antibodies and antigens. [1] The specific region an antibody recognizes on an antigen is called an epitope. Several antibodies can recognize the same epitope but differ in their binding affinity. The antibody with the higher affinity for a specific epitope will surpass antibodies with a lower affinity for the same epitope.[2][3]

By conjugating the antibody to a fluorophore, the position of the target biomolecule is visualized by exciting the fluorophore and measuring the emission of light in a specific predefined wavelength using a fluorescence microscope. It is imperative that the binding of the fluorophore to the antibody itself, do not interfere with the immunological specificity of the antibody or the binding capacity of its antigen.[4][5]

Immunofluorescence is a widely used example of immunostaining (using antibodies to stain proteins) and is a specific example of immunohistochemistry (the use of the antibody-antigen relationship in tissues). This technique primarily utilizes fluorophores to visualize the location of the antibodies, while others provoke a color change in the environment containing the antigen of interest or make use of a radioactive label. Immunofluorescent techniques that utilized labelled antibodies was conceptualized in the 1940s by Albert H. Coons.[2][6][7]

Photomicrograph of a histological section of human skin prepared for direct immunofluorescence using an anti-IgG antibody. The skin is from a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus and shows IgG deposit at two different places: The first is a band-like deposit along the epidermal basement membrane ("lupus band test" is positive). The second is within the nuclei of the epidermal cells (anti-nuclear antibodies).

Immunofluorescence is employed in foundational scientific investigations and clinical diagnostic endeavors, showcasing its multifaceted utility across diverse substrates, including tissue sections, cultured cell lines, or individual cells. Its usage includes analysis of the distribution of proteins, glycans, small biological and non-biological molecules, and visualization of structures such as intermediate-sized filaments.[8]

If the topology of a cell membrane is undetermined, epitope insertion into proteins can be used in conjunction with immunofluorescence to determine structures within the cell membrane.[9] Immunofluorescence (IF) can also be used as a “semi-quantitative” method to gain insight into the levels and localization patterns of DNA methylation. IF can additionally be used in combination with other, non-antibody methods of fluorescent staining, e.g., the use of DAPI to label DNA.[10][11]

Examination of immunofluorescence specimens can be conducted utilizing various microscope configurations, including the epifluorescence microscope, confocal microscope, and widefield microscope.[12]

Types

Main antinuclear antibody patterns on immunofluorescence.[13]

Preparation of fluorescence

To perform immunofluorescence staining, a fluorophore must be conjugated (“tagged”) to an antibody. Staining procedures can be applied to both retained intracellular expressed antibodies, or to cell surface antigens on living cells. There are two general classes of immunofluorescence techniques: primary (direct) and secondary (indirect).[1][2] The following descriptions will focus primarily on these classes in terms of conjugated antibodies.[12]

Primary (direct)

Basic concept of Primary Immunofluorescence: An antibody with a conjugated fluorophore, that is specifically bound to an epitope on the target molecule.

Primary (direct) immunofluorescence (DIF) uses a single antibody, conjugated to a fluorophore. The antibody recognizes the target molecule (antigen) and binds to a specific region, called the epitope. The attached fluorophore can be detected via fluorescent microscopy, which, depending on the type of fluorophore, will emit a specific wavelength of light once excited.[1][14]

The direct attachment of the fluorophore to the antibody reduces the number of steps in the sample preparation procedure, saving time and reducing non-specific background signal during analysis.[12] This also limits the possibility of antibody cross-reactivity, and possible mistakes throughout the process. One disadvantage of DIF is the limited number of antibodies that can bind to the antigen. This limitation may reduce sensitivity to the technique. When the target protein is available in only small concentrations, a better approach would be secondary IF, which is considered to be more sensitive than DIF [2][12] when compared to Secondary (Indirect) Immunofluorescence.[1]

Basic concept of Secondary Immunofluorescence: Secondary antibody, with a conjugated fluorophore, bound to a primary antibody that is specifically bound to an epitope on the target molecule.

Secondary (indirect)

Secondary (indirect) immunofluorescence (SIF) is similar to direct immunofluorescence, however the technique utilizes two types of antibodies whereas only one of them have a conjugated fluorophore. The antibody with the conjugated fluorophore is referred to as the secondary antibody, while the unconjugated is referred to as the primary antibody.[1]

The principle of this technique is that the primary antibody specifically binds to the epitope on the target molecule, whereas the secondary antibody, with the conjugated fluorophore, recognizes and binds to the primary antibody.[1]  

This technique is considered to be more sensitive than primary immunofluorescence, because multiple secondary antibodies can bind to the same primary antibody. The increased number of fluorophore molecules per antigen increases the amount of emitted light, and thus amplifies the signal.[1] There are different methods for attaining a higher fluorophore-antigen ratio such as the Avidin-Biotin Complex (ABC method) and Labeled Streptavidin-Biotin (LSAB method).[15][16]

Limitations

Basic concept of the ABC-method: Primary antibody binds to the antigen, before binding to the biotinylated secondary antibody. Avidin-Biotin enzyme complex (ABC) then attaches to the secondary antibody.

Immunofluorescence is only limited to fixed (i.e. dead) cells, when studying structures within the cell, as antibodies generally do not penetrate intact cellular or subcellular membranes in living cells, because they are large proteins. To visualize these structures, antigenic material must be fixed firmly on its natural localization inside the cell.[17] To study structures within living cells, in combination with fluorescence, one can utilize recombinant proteins containing fluorescent protein domains, e.g., green fluorescent protein (GFP). The GFP-technique involves altering the genetic information of the cells.[18][19]

A significant problem with immunofluorescence is photobleaching,[12] the fluorophores permanent loss of ability to emit light.[1] To mitigate the risk of photobleaching one can employ different strategies. By reducing or limiting the intensity, or timespan of light exposure, the absorption-emission cycle of fluorescent light is decreased, thus preserving the fluorophores functionality. One can also increase the concentration of fluorophores, or opt for more robust fluorophores that exhibit resilience against photobleaching such as Alexa Fluors, Seta Fluors, or DyLight Fluors.[2]

Basic concept of the LSAB-method: Utilizes a Streptavidin–enzyme conjugate for the identification of the biotinylated secondary antibody which is bound to the primary antibody. This approach is applicable when the Avidin–Biotin complex in the ABC method becomes too large.

Other problems that may arise when using immunofluorescence techniques include autofluorescence, spectral overlap and non-specific staining.[1][2] Autofluorescence includes the natural fluorescence emitted from the sample tissue or cell itself. Spectral overlap happens when a fluorophore has a broad emission specter, that overlaps with the specter of another fluorophore, thus giving rise to false signals. Non-specific staining occurs when the antibody, containing the fluorophore, binds to unintended proteins because of sufficient similarity in the epitope. This can lead to false positives.[2][4][1]

Advances

The main improvements to immunofluorescence lie in the development of fluorophores and fluorescent microscopes. Fluorophores can be structurally modified to improve brightness and photostability, while preserving spectral properties and cell permeability.[20]

Photomicrograph of a histological section of human skin prepared for direct immunofluorescence using an anti-IgA antibody. The skin is from a patient with Henoch–Schönlein purpura: IgA deposits are found in the walls of small superficial capillaries (yellow arrows). The pale wavy green area on top is the epidermis, the bottom fibrous area is the dermis.

Super-resolution fluorescence microscopy methods can produce images with a higher resolution than those microscopes imposed by the diffraction limit. This enables the determination of structural details within the cell.[21] Super-resolution in fluorescence, more specifically, refers to the ability of a microscope to prevent the simultaneous fluorescence of adjacent spectrally identical fluorophores (spectral overlap). Some of the recently developed super-resolution fluorescent microscope methods include stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy, saturated structured-illumination microscopy (SSIM), fluorescence photoactivation localization microscopy (FPALM), and stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM).[22]

Notable people

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Odell ID, Cook D (2013-01-01). "Immunofluorescence Techniques". Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 133 (1): e4. doi:10.1038/jid.2012.455. PMID 23299451.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g Joshi S, Yu D (2017), "Immunofluorescence", Basic Science Methods for Clinical Researchers, Elsevier, pp. 135–150, doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-803077-6.00008-4, ISBN 978-0-12-803077-6, retrieved 2024-02-14
  3. ^ Ladner RC (2007-01-01). "Mapping the epitopes of antibodies". Biotechnology & Genetic Engineering Reviews. 24 (1): 1–30. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.536.6172. doi:10.1080/02648725.2007.10648092. PMID 18059626. S2CID 34595289.
  4. ^ a b Marks KM, Nolan GP (August 2006). "Chemical labeling strategies for cell biology". Nature Methods. 3 (8): 591–596. doi:10.1038/nmeth906. ISSN 1548-7091. PMID 16862131. S2CID 27848267.
  5. ^ Owenius R, Österlund M, Lindgren M, Svensson M, Olsen OH, Persson E, Freskgård PO, Carlsson U (October 1999). "Properties of Spin and Fluorescent Labels at a Receptor-Ligand Interface". Biophysical Journal. 77 (4): 2237–2250. Bibcode:1999BpJ....77.2237O. doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77064-5. PMC 1300504. PMID 10512843.
  6. ^ Hökfelt T (November 1999). "Neurobiology thanks to microbiology: The legacy of Albert H. Coons (1912–1978)". Brain Research Bulletin. 50 (5–6): 371–372. doi:10.1016/S0361-9230(99)00109-4. PMID 10643440. S2CID 33618171.
  7. ^ Sheng W, Zhang C, Mohiuddin TM, Al-Rawe M, Zeppernick F, Falcone FH, Meinhold-Heerlein I, Hussain AF (2023-02-04). "Multiplex Immunofluorescence: A Powerful Tool in Cancer Immunotherapy". International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 24 (4): 3086. doi:10.3390/ijms24043086. ISSN 1422-0067. PMC 9959383. PMID 36834500.
  8. ^ Franke WW, Schmid E, Osborn M, Weber K (October 1978). "Different intermediate-sized filaments distinguished by immunofluorescence microscopy". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 75 (10): 5034–5038. Bibcode:1978PNAS...75.5034F. doi:10.1073/pnas.75.10.5034. PMC 336257. PMID 368806.
  9. ^ Wang H, Lee EW, Cai X, Ni Z, Zhou L, Mao Q (December 2008). "Membrane topology of the human breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP/ABCG2) determined by epitope insertion and immunofluorescence". Biochemistry. 47 (52): 13778–13787. doi:10.1021/bi801644v. PMC 2649121. PMID 19063604.
  10. ^ Çelik S (January 2015). "Understanding the complexity of antigen retrieval of DNA methylation for immunofluorescence-based measurement and an approach to challenge". Journal of Immunological Methods. 416: 1–16. doi:10.1016/j.jim.2014.11.011. PMID 25435341.
  11. ^ Grimason A, Smith H, Parker J, Bukhari Z, Campbell A, Robertson L (March 1994). "Application of DAPI and immunofluorescence for enhanced identification of Cryptosporidium spp oocysts in water samples". Water Research. 28 (3): 733–736. Bibcode:1994WatRe..28..733G. doi:10.1016/0043-1354(94)90154-6.
  12. ^ a b c d e Piña R, Santos-Díaz AI, Orta-Salazar E, Aguilar-Vazquez AR, Mantellero CA, Acosta-Galeana I, Estrada-Mondragon A, Prior-Gonzalez M, Martinez-Cruz JI, Rosas-Arellano A (2022-01-26). "Ten Approaches That Improve Immunostaining: A Review of the Latest Advances for the Optimization of Immunofluorescence". International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 23 (3): 1426. doi:10.3390/ijms23031426. ISSN 1422-0067. PMC 8836139. PMID 35163349.
  13. ^ Al-Mughales JA (2022). "Anti-Nuclear Antibodies Patterns in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Their Correlation With Other Diagnostic Immunological Parameters". Front Immunol. 13: 850759. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2022.850759. PMC 8964090. PMID 35359932.
    Minor edits by Mikael Häggström, MD
    - Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license
  14. ^ "Immunohistochemical Staining Methods" (PDF). IHC Guidebook (Sixth ed.). Dako Denmark A/S, An Agilent Technologies Company. 2013. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-08-03. Retrieved 2014-05-14.
  15. ^ Im K, Mareninov S, Diaz MF, Yong WH (2019), Yong WH (ed.), "An Introduction to Performing Immunofluorescence Staining", Biobanking, vol. 1897, New York, NY: Springer New York, pp. 299–311, doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-8935-5_26, ISBN 978-1-4939-8933-1, PMC 6918834, PMID 30539454
  16. ^ Yarilin D, Xu K, Turkekul M, Fan N, Romin Y, Fijisawa S, Barlas A, Manova-Todorova K (2015-03-31). "Machine-based method for multiplex in situ molecular characterization of tissues by immunofluorescence detection". Scientific Reports. 5 (1): 9534. Bibcode:2015NatSR...5E9534Y. doi:10.1038/srep09534. ISSN 2045-2322. PMC 4821037. PMID 25826597.
  17. ^ "Fixation and Permeabilization in in[sic] Immunocytochemistry/Immunofluorescence (ICC/IF)". Novus Biologicals. 2024-02-14. Retrieved 2024-02-14.
  18. ^ Ehrhardt D (December 2003). "GFP technology for live cell imaging". Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 6 (6): 622–628. Bibcode:2003COPB....6..622E. doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2003.09.014. PMID 14611963.
  19. ^ Chalfie M (October 1995). "Green fluorescent protein". Photochemistry and Photobiology. 62 (4): 651–656. doi:10.1111/j.1751-1097.1995.tb08712.x. PMID 7480149. S2CID 3944607.
  20. ^ Grimm JB, English BP, Chen J, Slaughter JP, Zhang Z, Revyakin A, Patel R, Macklin JJ, Normanno D, Singer RH, Lionnet T, Lavis LD (March 2015). "A general method to improve fluorophores for live-cell and single-molecule microscopy". Nature Methods. 12 (3): 244–250. doi:10.1038/nmeth.3256. ISSN 1548-7091. PMC 4344395. PMID 25599551.
  21. ^ Huang B, Bates M, Zhuang X (2009-06-02). "Super-resolution fluorescence microscopy". Annual Review of Biochemistry. 78: 993–1016. doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.061906.092014. PMC 2835776. PMID 19489737.
  22. ^ Leung BO, Chou KC (2011-09-01). "Review of Super-Resolution Fluorescence Microscopy for Biology". Applied Spectroscopy. 65 (9): 967–980. Bibcode:2011ApSpe..65..967L. doi:10.1366/11-06398. PMID 21929850. S2CID 5545465.
source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immunofluorescence

    by LabLynx

    Website

    Related Posts