FAIR and interactive data graphics from a scientific knowledge graph

Hi Will Tyson for real! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

• Turks in Germany (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello User:Will Tyson for real. You've been warned for edit warring per a complaint at the noticeboard. You are risking a block the next time you revert the article unless you have obtained a prior consensus for your change on the article talk page. If it is hard to reach agreement the steps of WP:Dispute resolution are open to you. Let me know if you have any questions. EdJohnston (talk) 05:17, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi EdJohnston, may I ask what revert you are referring to? Because I only reverted once to a version I edited back in early December[1]. Is this what you are talking about? Thanks. Will Tyson for real (talk) 05:52, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are the person who filed the report. I have no knowledge of this topic, and need to work with the complaint as it was presented. I do notice that you and User:Sseevv have a disagreement about the number of Turks in Germany. You made a large change to the article on 3 December and then User:Sseevv reverted your change. If you intend to make no more edits about that, it's fine. But should you feel that the article is still not correct, use WP:Dispute resolution instead of reverting again. The same advice has been given to Sseevv. I see there is an active discussion on the Talk page. If you need assistance opening up a WP:Request for comments let me know. Disputes like this one can often be settled by careful wording in the article. (We don't have ultimate knowledge of the number of Turks in Germany, we need to work with the actual data that may not be answering the exact question we have in mind). Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 18:56, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough EdJohnston, though I have refrained from editing anything on the main page since early December. Sveevv however has once again made more changes in favor of his viewpoint. This was a couple of weeks ago but he took the absence of response since to mean he could remove and make more changes. Will Tyson for real (talk) 09:23, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

EdJohnston will there be any action against Sseevv for removing and adding more in edits despite being warned? [2] Will Tyson for real (talk) 19:11, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you won't do anything about it I guess I'm just going to report him again. Will Tyson for real (talk) 16:51, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Will Tyson for real, thanks for your edits to Wikipedia. Based on the results of this investigation, it appears that you or someone that you know may have used a second account—specifically, Charlie Bostoner (talk · contribs)—to contribute to the discussion at Talk:Turks in Germany#Revising Demographic stats in the infobox. Please be aware that using multiple accounts in this manner is generally not allowed by Wikipedia policy. If you have used multiple accounts, please disclose your other accounts. If you haven't used multiple accounts, I apologize for this disruption. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 21:26, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately IT ISNT true, period. Though unfortunately there is no way for me to prove that. The constant edit warring of the person I have been debating with is however of great concern and something I'm a tad fed up with at the moment. Will Tyson for real (talk) 16:50, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Akevsharma was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle of Dead Man’s Ridge and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Akevsharma (talk) 10:20, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Will Tyson for real. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Dead Man’s Ridge, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Will Tyson for real. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Battle of Dead Man’s Ridge".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 12:37, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]