FAIR and interactive data graphics from a scientific knowledge graph

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

India: Delhi Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Delhi (assessed as Low-importance). Folklore Low‑importance This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Folklore, a WikiProject dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of the topics of folklore and folklore studies. If you would like to participate, you may edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project's page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to discussion.FolkloreWikipedia:WikiProject FolkloreTemplate:WikiProject FolkloreFolklore Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Removed "reports" likely to be urban legends. We should start sourcing the incident reports. Zora 00:19, 2 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 September 2020 and 18 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Karim Akkkk.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:25, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is that the british spelling? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Puddytang (talk • contribs) 05:10, 21 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Furore is the British spelling, and also the Indian English spelling. Wiki spelling policy determines that the if the article is about a subject specific to a particular geographical area the spelling of that area ought to be used. 'Furor' is the American English spelling and, as such, less preferable in this article about India.

Hail to the monkey man!

hahaha monkey man... thats rich

intriguing and hilarious story. i've read the related articles and the Time one seems to poke fun at this notion. monkey man, hahaha. 220.245.7.233 (talk) 10:20, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This doesn't meet Wikipedia standereds.

I think this doesn't befit the granduer of Wikipedia. I mean, are you serious? a monkey man? This is stupid. Common, are there any right-minded scientists out there? This is shiz (s**t).Just like spring heeled jack i propose linking the two together there are a number of similarities

-Yahya Al-Shiddazi —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.138.47.13 (talk) 11:34, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously?! Does this topic need a wiki page? i was surprised to find another article linking "monkey man of delhi". Wll, it's been a long time since i logged in to wikipedia. I would have proposed a deletion, if i remembered how. (I hope four tildes is still the way to sign) -Vijay 117.192.59.82 (talk) 17:43, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

182.74.4.10 has added a number of edits reverted by me and other editors. These edits are very low quality, based on both personal experience and "Mr maliks wall on favebook (sic). There are some references (not formatted) that link to Indian newspapers in a local script (these really are not WP:VER, the one English reference goes to an article that clearly states the "Monkey-man" is totally made up which is i'm sure not what the editor is trying to say. And yes I have been to India and no I don't really know about the Monkey-Man except that this and other crypto-zoological manias are just that - a mania. Andrewgprout (talk) 22:59, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Monkey-man of Delhi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150627212301/http://indianjmedsci.org/article.asp?issn=0019-5359;year=2003;volume=57;issue=8;spage=355;epage=60;aulast=Verma to http://www.indianjmedsci.org/article.asp?issn=0019-5359;year=2003;volume=57;issue=8;spage=355;epage=60;aulast=Verma
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150627212301/http://indianjmedsci.org/article.asp?issn=0019-5359;year=2003;volume=57;issue=8;spage=355;epage=60;aulast=Verma to http://www.indianjmedsci.org/article.asp?issn=0019-5359;year=2003;volume=57;issue=8;spage=355;epage=60;aulast=Verma

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:23, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]