FAIR and interactive data graphics from a scientific knowledge graph

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Anime and manga: Dragon Ball Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Dragon Ball work group.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: https://www.excite.co.jp/news/article/E1504839132184/

If anything, the articles for DBZ and DBGT should be restored. Dragon Ball and Dragon Ball Z and Dragon Ball GT are separate entities set within the same franchise. Having Dragon Ball Z be nothing more than a section in the main Dragon Ball article is like having Star Trek: The Next Generation be nothing more than a section in the Star Trek article. They should be split back up, there is more than enough notable content, sources, and differences. Also, it's misleading to have Dragon Ball Z redirect to Dragon Ball. TJ Spyke 15:47, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I Second This Motion - Gohan — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.80.188.172 (talk) 15:16, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As follows,

Since 2014, with the release of the film Dragon Ball Z: Battle of Gods and the announcement of its sequel, both of which feature heavy involvement from Toriyama, the canonicity of Dragon Ball GT has been called into question. ^[1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.113.113.161 (talk • contribs) 16:04, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikia, or any open wiki, and especially a forum post on the Wikia is not a reliable source of information. —Farix (t | c) 18:19, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What problem do you have? Reference is first rate. Wikipedia is for all users while respecting the rules. You are breaking the rules. Tell me if there's a problem with the reference (no lies), or it is not of interest to some.--Battousai hades (talk) 21:02, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Reception section of this article states that reviews were mixed to negative but the section only states mostly negative points. This needs reworded to show a more NPOV. DrkBlueXG (talk) 17:12, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Funny how practically nothing changed years after you called them out on that. I'd also like to point out that the average reviews, regardless of anyone's personal opinion, are inarguably mixed to positive. It has a 6.8 on imdB and a 70% user rating on Rotten Tomatoes. These are mainly English-speaking sites. How many of those audiences do you think watched the dub? Whoever pasted all those quotes dogpiling on the show is clearly biased and trying to paint the narrative that almost everyone hates in when most people don't. If you actually read those quotes, they're hardly relevant. For example, "a bad idea that spawned out of someone's desire to make more money on the back of Toriyama's work," is factually incorrect. Toriyama designed the main cast, designed many planets they visit, approved the initial outline, named the show, designed the logo, oversaw production, and is openly very proud of it. Also, if they'd done their research, they'd know that the show that came out differs from their original vision. They're citing Todd Douglass Jr. of DVD Talk lmao, really scraping the bottom of the barrel there. I'd remove it, but someone's just bound to put it back. JohnStartop (talk) 00:37, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Dragonball (4-Star).svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:37, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How do I watch it 2A00:23C7:76DD:E701:A560:5DE4:229E:292C (talk) 07:29, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this page is for discussing improvements to the article only, not a forum for general talk about Dragon Ball GT. Bowler the Carmine | talk 20:15, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect ベビー has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 26 § ベビー until a consensus is reached. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 09:11, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect ドラゴンボールGT has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 26 § ドラゴンボールGT until a consensus is reached. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 09:12, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]