Effects of the storage conditions on the stability of natural and synthetic cannabis in biological matrices for forensic toxicology analysis: An update from the literature

Posted on February 13, 2023 By LabLynx Journal articles

Add links
< February 7 February 9 >

February 8

Category:Regions in Northern Areas (Pakistan)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. Good Ol’factory (talk) 00:54, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming Category:Regions in Northern Areas (Pakistan) to Category:Regions of Gilgit-Baltistan
Nominator's rationale: Rename. (Moved from speedy.) The article is at Gilgit-Baltistan, while Northern Areas (Pakistan) is a redirect. Also, the convention in the region categories is "regions of", not "regions in". (If there's no consensus for the proposed name, at least rename to Category:Regions of Northern Areas (Pakistan).) Jafeluv (talk) 15:28, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Taoist eschatology

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Eschatology. — ξxplicit 02:51, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Taoist eschatology ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Only one article. I know a little bit about Daoism and I don't think there is much possibility for growth as it is essentially agnostic about the world to come (i.e. I don't think there is much Daoist eschatology.) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:35, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Addendum The one article can be upmerged to Category:Eschatology. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:36, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:FloppyOS

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Floppy disk-based operating systems. — ξxplicit 02:51, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming Category:FloppyOS to Category:?
Nominator's rationale: Arguably a CamelCase neologism. Not sure what to rename it to though. Pcap ping 16:44, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jafeluv (talk) 09:25, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Massachusetts College of Art

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. Even though they're not tagged, I'm going to rename the subcategories for consistency to save the work of another nomination that would undoubtedly result in renaming them. Good Ol’factory (talk) 00:49, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming Category:Massachusetts College of Art to Category:Massachusetts College of Art and Design
Nominator's rationale: Moved from Wikipedia:Requested moves Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:34, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:American political documentary films

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge into Category:American documentary films. Kbdank71 15:42, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Suggest merging Category:American political documentary films to Category:Documentaries about American politics
Nominator's rationale: Duplicate category; merge to Documentaries about American politics. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:39, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Current events from January 2010

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Speedied as empty/emptied monthly maintenance category. Per convention, any admin can delete these when empty/emptied. Debresser (talk) 08:46, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Current events from January 2010 ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: No longer needed. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 05:03, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Sculptures by artist

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Rename all as nominated. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:01, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming
Nominator's rationale: Rename all these subcats of Category:Sculptures by artist to clarify that that they are sculptures by the artist rather than of the artist. This follows the convention of the parent Category:Works by artist, though of many of its sub-categories do not follow this convention. This nomination is a proposal to change the convention set out at Wikipedia:Naming conventions (categories)#Visual_arts; if there is consensus for this change I will do a similar nomination for the much bigger Category:Paintings by artist. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 03:54, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Songs that reached number one on CCM chart

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. — ξxplicit 02:51, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Songs that reached number one on CCM chart ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Chart not specified. Per WP:GOODCHARTS, Colombia does not have an official, reputable singles chart. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 02:29, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strange Somewhere back in history, this cat seems to have been re-purposed. How and why it went from being about contemporary Christian music to Colombian music I'm not quite understanding, though. Odd. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 08:12, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Political organizations in the United Kingdom by ideology

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Kbdank71 15:27, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Political organizations in the United Kingdom by ideology ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: This was just closed due to proceduralism: I emptied it and then decided to nominate it, not emptied it in order to nominate it.

Anyway, it's a pointless category. Delete. Fences&Windows 00:22, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • As you can see form the logs of the "Political organizations in ... by ideology" categories, this is work in progress, actually I just started work. Besides anarchist organizations there are organizations of quite some more ideologies yet to be categorized - and they will be categorized at exactly this category level. This category level is indeed useful to reduce chaos, to avoid cluttering, to allow for consistent structure between countries and between ideologies and to keep categorization in the article namespace clear and simple. So please wait and see it developping, and if the categories should still be quasi empty, feel free to file an rfd. Just stating, it were pointless is no argument though, but an unsubstantiated opinion. PanchoS (talk) 00:31, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Addition: Take a look at Political movements in Argentina. At the moment, this would be just as much an candidate for an rfd. Now see Political movements in the United Kingdom, which already has been populated. It would have been just as empty be yesterday or so. But apart from this work-in-progress argument: I don't see a problem in varyingly populated categories, as long as they are part of a useful structure. If, say, Political movements in Belize would be hardly populated it still made sense to guide new articles to an existing category structure. If someone writes the second article about an islamist group in Estonia, and the one existing is already properly categorized, then it's easy to place the new one there, too. If not, it will probably end up somewhere else and produce cleanup work. However, this must obviously be carefully balanced with the objective not to overcategorize or produce empty categories. PanchoS (talk) 00:49, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Political ideologies do not have have clearly-defined edges, and people and organisations rarely fit neatly within those loose boundaries, so they are a poor basis for categorising people or organisations. Such categories inevitably lead to POV disputes, sometimes due to POV-pushing, but more often due to good faith differences in interpretations. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 01:44, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • This is indeed an argument, but it fails the topic this is about. I'm not categorizing individual or organization articles with an ideology tag. In fact there are already hundreds of categories like "Indian islamists" and "Spanish anarchists" or "Canadian conservatives". And there are hundreds of categories like "Trotskyist organisations of Mexico" or "Fascist political parties in Spain" (many of these categories have been existing for years, and obviously the POV-conflicts were containable). All I'm doing is giving these categories a consistent naming scheme and a systematic place within the category tree. Potential POV -conflicts arise from tagging an organization or individual with the label "anarchist" or "communist" or "nationalist". This potentially POVish tagging happens within the article text rather than by categorization. In any case it does not happen within the category tree structure, meaning that this has nothing to do with the contested category. PanchoS (talk) 03:05, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:FC College alumni

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Rename. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:14, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming Category:FC College alumni to Category:Forman Christian College alumni
Nominator's rationale: Rename, to match head article Forman Christian College. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 00:07, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Political organizations in the United Kingdom by ideology

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Procedural close. Emptying a category before bringing it to CfD pre-empts any decision which might be made at CFD, thereby making the discussion pointless. I have repopulated the category (without prejudice to its merits or otherwise), and it may be nominated again if anyone wants to, but so long as it is not emptied beforehand. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 00:16, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Political organizations in the United Kingdom by ideology ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: I just empted this category by moving the only subcategory up one level - it's not a useful categorisation. Fences&Windows 00:02, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2010_February_8

    by LabLynx

    Website

    Related Posts