Effects of the storage conditions on the stability of natural and synthetic cannabis in biological matrices for forensic toxicology analysis: An update from the literature

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:55, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

John Parker (boxer)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NBOX or WP:GNG

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:08, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:08, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Boxing-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:08, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Doesn't pass NBOX as a pro yet, probably will soon due to the team he is with but he does pass as he won his national title in the amateurs.--Donniediamond (talk) 13:02, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:NBOX is irrelevant if he doesn't meet WP:GNG. Routine fight coverage and promotions do not meet WP:GNG, nor do passing mentions based on his brother's successful boxing career. Claiming notability based on his boxing team and/or future pro success requires WP:CRYSTALBALL and violates WP:NOTINHERITED. Willing to change my vote if significant independent coverage is shown. Papaursa (talk) 02:11, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I don't think a New Zealand amateur title justifies inclusion - New Zealand is a small country that isn't a major boxing nation. He's done nothing of note yet as a pro, although if he wins the NZ title next month he'd have more of a claim. Coverage so far is insufficient in my view. --Michig (talk) 09:15, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.