Effects of the storage conditions on the stability of natural and synthetic cannabis in biological matrices for forensic toxicology analysis: An update from the literature

• /Archive 1

Why have you reverted the vitalstatistics?(Halbared 21:25, 2 June 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Well apart from the US (and aspects of the UK) the whole world uses metric as their primary system. I think it's looks sloppy to have a few stats a different way around, since this is an English speaking Wiki. But I'll leave it.(Halbared 09:08, 3 June 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Should be in Imperial first. It is the most widely recognised form of weight and height measurement and is still used for our other athletes like boxers. If you go to a British wrestling event, they do not announce people in metric, they are announced in Imperial, please do not put metric first. The stats of British wreslters should be in Imperial (British) measurement first and then metric.(Halbared 22:07, 3 June 2006 (UTC))[reply]

That page doesn't say that he has dual nationality, but I'll leave it and take your word that it's in the shoot.(Halbared 15:46, 28 June 2006 (UTC))[reply]

The reason I keep changing it is because the current format doesn't follow other previous finishers i.e. the ones listed in Kurt Angle, Fit Finlay or Edge. I realise that Punk is a special case with using the same name but a different move but it looks awkward. --- Lid 10:10, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The reverse hurricanrana links to the reverse frankensteiner under throws rather than reverse frankensteiner under aerial. The distinction is for people to diffenciate that Punk does both the top rope and standing versions and that in modern wrestling the name frankensteiner is only ever used in the top rope version while it is in nearly every case referred to as a harracanrana rather than a frankensteiner. --- Lid 11:07, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you revert my edit to his manuvers list? Van Dam has done the diving leg drop as a finisher several times in ECW, finished a lot of great tag team matches with it, and yet you move it to a signature move. RVD has done a running leg lariat at the turnbuckle 2x so far, and it should be added. I labelled the superkick as a side kick because Tazz refers to it as a side kick, and if you didnt notice, in the superkick page, the superkick is also called a side kick. Im gonna put it back to the way i put it b4, and 1 more question, why is the split legged moonsault set as a hollywood star press 1st, then split legged moonsault after? Arent you supposed to label the current name in front of past names? Thats the way it is in Shelton Benjamin's page, so i think thats the way it should be labelled in the list. Also, i think it should just be called "Finishing and signature moves" instead of 2 seperate things, because some moves are used as BOTH finishing and signature, and people shouldnt be confused over if the split legged moonsault and diving leg drop is a current finisher, signature move, or BOTH. Just my opinion on the situation. I left something on the RVD Discussion page, so if you can answer my comments, answer it there until I get my talk page up and running. Thanks =). TJ Sparks 03:45, Sept. 21, 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Toshiaki-Kawada.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:11, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Toshiaki-Kawada.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Chowbok ☠ 19:53, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Shark-Tsuchiya-chokes-Megumi-Kudo.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:54, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Mixed martial arts is now taking suggestions for the new MMA article improvement drive! Please add your input to decide what our first collaboration should be. VegaDark 21:29, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Fujiwara-armbar.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:50, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A lot of people have Ura-nage as a signature name for their side slam on TV. Be careful who you change that for. Cheers, -- The Hybrid 06:58, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That is what they call it when they do it. It is like the Undertaker's Tombstone Piledriver being called that rather then a Belly to Belly Piledriver. It is just a name, and it should be left that way in spite of the move's actual name. Cheers, -- The Hybrid 13:52, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, then Rey Mysterio's 619. Also, thanks for switching it back. Cheers, -- The Hybrid 13:57, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have re-inserted my citation tag, please provide a source. A Google search [1] backs up my requirement of a source. One Night In Hackney 14:44, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I'd say "reverse side throw" is a better phrase to be honest though. Almost every judo site I've checked describes it as a reverse throw, so phrasing it the other way is very confusing. One Night In Hackney 15:24, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Will do, just thought it more polite to get your opinion first, especially as we were discussing it. Thanks. One Night In Hackney 15:38, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed he insult. The anon has been blocked for incivility. However, please be careful of WP:3RR even in such cases William M. Connolley 10:01, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. Is this warning for reaching three or four? Because I tried to not revert more than three times, and did the fourth ones after the user had been blocked. I understood this would be acceptable from Wikipedia:Three-revert rule#Reverting edits from banned or blocked users. ↪Lakes (Talk) 17:11, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't appreciate how you are trying to basically delete every article I have created, it is really a low life thing to do. Kris Classic 01:04, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not started by me! Right here, thought I'd let you know. One Night In Hackney 19:42, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

can someone please help me keep my Nate Webb article from being deleted, i am trying to put up his official website but, it's on the blacklist, any idea that i can get it off?

You cant just expect me to leave something just beacuse you say so, you aint nothing! and i havent done anything so stop being all over me with your little fingers here on this internet site.

new name same rubbish (User:Idres) --- Paulley

Just to let you know the case has gone to Checkuser and hopefully they can block out his range of IP's before he trys to comeback. --- Paulley

We've got another Verdict sockpuppet, user:Kurt Angle Fan. Same exact edits, but I don't know if it should go to checkuser or another sockpupper report or what.«»bd(^talk _stalk) 02:43, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I altered the shown name of his signature suplex to 'waistlock suplex' purely for the reason that people were not checking the definition of Saito Suplex and changing it. I thought an English description might persuade them not to. I've noticed NOAH commentators seem to call it "Back Suplex", but it clearly fits the definition for Saito suplex and I'm happy to leave it as that. Suriel1981 13:30, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Btw, I noticed you removed the internal link to the WP Budokan Hall page and removed Morishima's signature missile dropkick, I've assumed both were a mistake. Suriel1981 13:32, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Morishima likes to use a front dropkick off the top turnbuckle for near-pinfalls. It's become something of a signature move because wrestlers that big don't usually do missile dropkicks. Suriel1981 14:46, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My bad, no harm meant, I didn't look far back enough in the history. Bmg916 ^{Speak to Me}

This is already listed elsewhere as the electric chair bomb which is the name used for the move. I'm not sure what articles link to electric chair bomb but as the move is a facebuster they probably need redirecting. –– Lid^(Talk) 12:20, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

First off, as far as the punch combo, he climaxed with a big LEFT hand. Watch one of his matches and see. Secondly, winning one deathmatch with a punch hardly equates to making that move the wrestler's main finisher. Thirdly, the Hangman's neckbreaker (called as such) and DDT have been regularly used in Funk matches. Again, watch one of his matches and see. Ergo me reverting their removal. Suriel1981 15:12, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Lakes could you please stop putting useless information on Jimmy Rave finishing and signature move and if you find a better place to put that info on KENTA and better place i would not erase it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 141.157.240.203 (talk) 19:27, 11 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Gary Albright, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please find and add a reliable citation to your recent edit so we can verify your work. Uncited information may be removed at any time. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! Can't sleep, clown will eat me 08:11, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Where did you find his real name and "Trelaine" ring name from? –– Lid^(Talk) 00:21, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any problem with the name of the barnstar being "The Wrestling Star"? TJ Spyke 23:29, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe we should call it the Austin Starr :-) ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 13:47, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Thanks for the feedback at the PW talk page and for letting me know in advance you were putting the "prod" on it. I did remove the prod as I feel it meets notability requirements but I did add a note on the talk page and welcome your further feedback. Thank you! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shavenhead2 (talk • contribs) 12:27, 6 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Jushin_Liger.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 13:53, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that at some point you created a few sub-templates related to Template:MMAstatsbox. All of the templates are unused and orphaned. Would you have any objection to me deleting them (listed below)? Cheers. --MZMcBride 02:29, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

1. {{MMAstatsbox/died}} (uses)
2. {{MMAstatsbox/fightingfrom}} (uses)
3. {{MMAstatsbox/fightstyle}} (uses)
4. {{MMAstatsbox/image}} (uses)
5. {{MMAstatsbox/ko}} (uses)
6. {{MMAstatsbox/nick}} (uses)
7. {{MMAstatsbox/nocontest}} (uses)
8. {{MMAstatsbox/submissions}} (uses)

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter

In case you are not aware, the Wikimedia Foundation has proposed that the copyright licensing terms on the wikis operated by the WMF – including Wikipedia – be changed to include the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC-BY-SA) license in addition to the current GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) as allowed by version 1.3 of the GFDL. The community has approved this change with 75.8% in favor, and on June 15, 2009, the change will take effect.
You currently have {{NoMultiLicense}} on your user or user talk page, which states that your edits are licensed under the GFDL only. On or before June 15, this template will be changed to reflect Wikipedia's new licensing terms. If you accept the licensing change, you do not need to do anything (and feel free to remove this message); if you do not accept it, we regret that you will no longer be able to contribute to the encyclopedia. Please join the discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#NoMultiLicense template if you have any comments.

Delivered by The Helpful Bot at 20:21, 2 June 2009 (UTC) for the Village pump. Report errors here. [reply]

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter

Template:Infobox MMAstats has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork (talk) 17:46, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter

It has recently been brought to the attention of WP:PW that the newsletter is being to delivered to several users who have not been actively editing for several months. As a result, their talk pages have become increasingly large, unmanageable and slow to load due to a lack of archiving.
In response, this message is being sent to all editors listed in Category:WikiProject Professional wrestling participants to say that anyone who does not list their name at Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Active before May 16 will be automatically listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Nospam, and will no longer receive the newsletter or any notification of it. If you are added to Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Nospam, please feel free to remove your name if you desire.
If you wish to continue receiving the newsletter as normal, please add your name to Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Active. If you simply wish to receive notification of a new issue, but not have the full newsletter delivered to your talk page, please add your name to the notification only list.
If you have any queries please contact me at my talk page or leave a message at WT:PW. Thank you for your co-operation. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 00:36, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]