Cybersecurity and privacy risk assessment of point-of-care systems in healthcare: A use case approach

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by .

The world was created for all.
No one is perfect even AI's do mis fault. Stay cool, just alert me and I will see it off!
— SafariScribe

If you are here just to castigated me (I know there shouldn't be "d", so it's a mistake; fix it yourself), please don't come here. Find anywhere in your talk page, then ping me for opinion. Welcome to my talk page, and ask questions as you will answer when it's thrown to you. I have no other account and have never edited for any payment whatsoever.

Matador Network draft

Thanks for reviewing my update to this draft so quickly. I would love feedback from you on what it would need to meet the notability standard. Matador Network is one of the largest travel publishers in the world. It has more web traffic than Travel + Liesure. The sources include dedicated stories in major outlets with GuideGeek (one of Matador's main products) in the headline such as Fast Company, Forbes, Fox Business and I just added TechTimes today. I added a few more sources just now that I hope push it across the line. Any additional feedback would be greatly appreciated. Thank you, Caffrey, Neil. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Caffrey, Neil (talk • contribs)

@Caffrey, Neil, this should be Draft:Matador Network. I will take a look at it again and give feedback if it isn't accepted. Also I may leave it for another reviewer but a slight note: it has some unreliable sources. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 19:50, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Stark draft

Hi @SafariScribe, my draft article on Chris Stark, the UK's new head of net zero was declined. Which is fine. Before I go and edit though, I'd like to be clear on what the issue was specifically. Grateful if you could give me a steer :-)

Leaving aside Wikipedia's notability and referencing policies for a second, I am assuming that his notability is not objectively in question. He has been named the new UK Labour government's Net Zero czar by the Energy Security Secretary, one of Ed Miliband's first (if not *the* first) appointments since he has come into office. Stark was the subject of an official announcement on GOV.UK. He is one of the UK's leading experts on climate change, and was previously the CEO of the UK government's Climate Change Committee – the UK's main authority on climate change – for 6 years.

If he is not notable, then we need to talk about at least 20% of Wikipedia, who have got past the notability test. For example, how is it different to the article on Tom Delay, who absolutely should have an article on Wikipedia, but whose referencing is very similar. It sometimes feels this rule is not consistently applied (or maybe hasn't been in the past)?

So, to come back to my question, is the issue that the sources were not credible? The Guardian is a tier 1 newspaper, GOV.UK is the government's website, Business Green and Renewable Energy Magazine are credible trade publications, and Carbon Trust and the Climate Change Committee are reputable organisations. I thought this would easily clear the WP:THREE test, but I can accept that:

> Carbon Trust and the Climate Change Committee – though reliable sources in other contexts – might be considered too close to the subject.

> Business Green and Renewable Energy Magazine – though credible trade publications might not be well known outside the sector of energy and sustainability.

If that is the case, this is useful to know. So is it a case of one or two more Guardian-level references? That's ok – there are loads more articles that talk about Stark's work, from the FT, The Guardian, the New Statesman, the BBC. I just don't want to waste my time! :-) KTnow (talk) 13:46, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SafariScribe Any thoughts on this? Thanks in advance! KTnow (talk) 16:43, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

^bump @SafariScribe - thanks. KTnow (talk) 16:53, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@KTnow, I have just seen this. It's being long here. I'm sorry for not being productive in replying to this. Ok, let me take a look again, and always remember to link the draft for me here. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 19:09, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem @SafariScribe, appreciate you taking a look. KTnow (talk) 19:29, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done: @KTnow, I have applied WP:AFCSTANDARDS and believe it will survive AFD. Don't be discouraged as we're humans right? Always write like this one, your wiring is very good. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 19:48, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @SafariScribe. KTnow (talk) 21:20, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question about sources for declined translated page

@SafariScribe Hello there, and thanks for checking out my draft Draft:Sossio_Giametta so promptly. I have the same question as a few other people here - I don't quite understand what more sources would be needed. I used very prestigious and independent Italian newspapers and the Italian BBC. Could you please explain what the problem is? Bravenewworld1984 (talk) 08:27, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Bravenewworld1984,

Having an article about a translator is a not bad, but it's important to remember they are also considered like writers. Your draft appears to lack the sources a possible complete WP:BLP should have, which, as you know, is stricter on the English Wikipedia than on other Wikipedias. Welp, you should also add identifiers for the books, such as the ISBN, Google Books URL, or a citation where he was credited as the translator. These are essential for verification. Cheers. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 15:01, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @SafariScribefor getting back to me so promptly. I have added all ISBNs and inserted Giametta's works as a translator as separate from his authored ones. Also, just a minor note - it's not a bio of a living person but of a dead one as he passed in January this year. Best :-) Bravenewworld1984 (talk) 10:16, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh! A deceased? My bad. I see you have resubmitted it. Another reviewer will look at it. Good luck! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 19:08, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help me understand why you rejected my draft for Linda Rabbitt?

Hi @SafariScribe, I left a couple of questions for you on my Talk page, and I thought I'd follow-up here on your Talk page. :) I look forward to hearing from you. Thank you. Sincerely, BlueRoses13 (talk) 15:18, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry for the delay @BlueRoses13, I will follow up as soon as possible. Thanks. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 15:03, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SafariScribe That would be great — thank you. Sincerely, BlueRoses13 (talk) 12:27, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SafariScribe So sorry to continue pestering you. I left a long reply to you in WikiProject Articles for Creation on July 26, but then I received a notification that this thread was no longer active. Here's the message:

Topic "10:44, 25 July 2024 review of submission by BlueRos..." was archived or removed from Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk.

You might no longer receive notifications about this topic.

So, I'm not sure how to proceed. I absolutely want to be patient. After all, you're volunteering your time, and I know your plate is full with AfC. At the same time, I want to make sure my follow-up doesn't get lost in the shuffle.

So:

1. Would you like me to just go ahead and resubmit the draft?

2. Would you like more time to reply to my reply?

3. Should I do something else?

Please let me know whatever is best; I'm eager for your guidance and wisdom.

Thanks so much!

Sincerely,

BlueRoses13 (talk) 12:51, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@BlueRoses13, I have dropped looking at the draft after the reply at AFC help desk. Don't ever be discouraged, you are improving in whatever way. Also if you feel you have done the feedback, request that I check on it again. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 19:06, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SafariScribe Thanks! Yep, I incorporated your feedback on July 26 — but I didn't resubmit, since I've been waiting to hear from you. I just clicked "resubmit," and I sure would be grateful for another review. Thanks so much for all your hard work. Cheers! BlueRoses13 (talk) 21:09, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SafariScribe Hi there, I just want to thank you for being so generous with your time and expertise in helping me get this page across the finish line. I appreciate greatly your detailed feedback! All the best, BlueRoses13 (talk) 12:00, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Review declined

Draft:Sovereign_Gold_Bond

I have listed multiple sources, I can easily show a 100 articles from top new sites about the scheme.

A google search would have shown that the there are thousand of articles and videos on this topic. Skratata69 (talk) 21:21, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @SafariScribe

I have added articles from the most reliable sources in my country and as agreed upon on Wikipedia. (The Hindu / WP:THEHINDU and The Times of India / WP:TOI). Please have a look at the draft again when you are free. Skratata69 (talk) 20:26, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Skratata69, You did great. I will leave another reviewer to review it. Good luck! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 19:04, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 21:46:25, 20 July 2024 for assistance on AfC submission by Scrobum

Scrobum (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Every Single Someone ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi @SafariScribe! Thanks for reviewing, this is my first Wikipedia article submission so bear with me. Think this meets all necessary criteria for notability, have found other existing pages for films with less of a footprint. Wondering if the issue is overuse of aggregate-style sources? If not, please let me know what I can change!

Scrobum (talk) 21:46, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UPDATED @SafariScribe -- I took another look at the notability guidelines, believe this film still qualifies but can see that the references I included are insufficient. Question: I found some other reviews of this movie online, should I include all reviews in the article? feels like overkill on that front. Scrobum (talk) 10:51, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just bumping this up @SafariScribe -- Thanks! Scrobum (talk) 14:24, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bumping this up again. Thanks! @SafariScribe Scrobum (talk) 14:24, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Scrobum, you greatly updated the article. Here are few issues to note and correct to get accepted. Projected Figures, Midwest Film Journal, and Apple TV are not reliable. At least, three film reviews from a reputable and reliable publisher/newspaper/magazine is good . Remove the above I have listed, find two other good sources, which you can ask me before inputting. Good luck! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 19:03, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Awaiting response from a declined draft

Hi, @SafariScribe: , I tries to engage you [here] but no response, I am confused by this decision, as the article included sourcing from several major reliable news publications per WP:NGRS which includes Independent in-depth reliable sources on the draft to pass Notability and he has coverage with byline and they are not passing mentioned. Sophia2030 (talk) 11:00, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sophia2030, can I get the link of the draft? Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 16:07, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, @SafariScribe: ,

Here is the Draft link. Thanks. Sophia2030 (talk) 17:03, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, @SafariScribe: , I am still awaiting your response on the draft as requested before I resubmit. Thanks in anticipation. Sophia2030 (talk) 20:09, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sophia2030, your draft is well written, however, you may need to read WP: NARTIST. Using reliable sources, cite more exhibitions and awards; they help establish notability. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 18:56, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SafariScribe Can you kindly take a closer look, the Draft has UpTo the minimum independent and reliable sources to qualify for other areas like WP:GNG and WP:BASIC Sophia2030 (talk) 22:37, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 19:19:55, 22 July 2024 for assistance on AfC submission by Jbsmitty

Jbsmitty (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Tim Sheehy (businessman) ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Is there any specific assistance you need with the draft? Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 18:57, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 22:18:17, 23 July 2024 for assistance on AfC submission by Thirdward544

Thirdward544 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Rick Barrett ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SafariScribe, I saw the message about my article: "This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources." Does it need more sources or different sources?

Thirdward544 (talk) 22:18, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This has been handled by Tim Trent. To your question @Thirdward544, it means that the existing sources are not enough or reliable to support the contents of the page. Do you still need a hand? Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 19:55, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are crunching through the drafts, which is great

May I ask you, please, seriously to consider more use of comments, even though it will slow you down. We need to give folk all the pointers we can in order to persuade them to create better drafts. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:38, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly, I will Trent. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 22:45, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may find the creation of a reasonably standard set to be useful. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:48, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SafariScribe You haven't responded to this: Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk#13:53:58, 23 July 2024 review of submission by 104.232.119.107 104.232.119.107 (talk) 00:09, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 19:55, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this. I agree.

There do seem to be several requests for assistance on this page from authors whose articles have been declined for 'lack of reliable sources' who are struggling to understand what is wrong with the sources they have already cited. If the aim is to provide actionable feedback in order to allow a draft to be improved, then it would be helpful if authors could receive more pointers. It seems ironic if a finding of 'lack of reliable sources' is itself not substantiated.

I appreciate that the more details a reviewer provides the longer it takes, and that reviewers have to balance the needs of individual authors with the wish to serve many authors by getting through many drafts. Nevertheless I think if a little more information were provided first time around, it would ultimately save time because authors wouldn't need to come back and request clarification. Klighed (talk) 14:39, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Timtrent and @Klighed for acknowledging the need for feedback – it can indeed be frustrating to have a draft rejected without a good explanation, especially when you think you have sourced it appropriately. And it can discourage members from submitting any further new articles in the future, which would be a shame. I'm sure that isn't the intention.

My question on the draft I submitted is still listed above. I feel I'm still (relatively) new here and I like to think I have approached Wikipedia editing in a polite and humble way. (And if my question above was phrased in an impolite way, I apologise). Everyone can't be an expert on everything! The point is it's hard to improve without specific feedback. (The generic guidance on the platform will only get you so far, I feel I'm at a point where I just need to try things – and sometimes fail, but understanding what a draft needs in order to be approved is key to this learning process. Anyway, I appreciate this recognition from senior editors, it makes me feel more confident about the process. KTnow (talk) 17:16, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@KTnow This disappoints me. I am too tired tonight. If you remind me tomorrow I will have a look. Please use my talk page to alert me any time after 0900 UTC 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:05, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To Safari's credit, they have slowed down but now they need to catch up on responding to queries. Some of them have been archived without response, granted a few did also ask at the Teahouse or AFCHD but not all. S0091 (talk) 18:29, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@S0091, I do reply or have answered them somewhere before archiving. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 18:53, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for picking this up @Timtrent and @S0091, @SafariScribe and I are on it now. Thanks all, appreciate it. KTnow (talk) 19:34, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I missed this. @KTnow, I'm very very sorry for the delay as it isn't intentional. I have and even recently adapted to adding clear comments to declined drafts and help some before accepting them. However, maybe you didn't link the draft for me to see. I apologize and please link it here for me to give feedback. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 18:51, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's ok @SafariScribe, I appreciate it. The link is: Chris Stark (climate expert). Look forward to hearing back – I have no doubt it can be improved, I'm just really interested in what specifically to look at. Thank you! :-) KTnow (talk) 19:32, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done: you wrote well and keep doing that. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 19:56, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the kind words @SafariScribe. KTnow (talk) 21:18, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad to see this is being picked up.

My draft was rejected very quickly and I asked (User talk:SafariScribe#Request on 09:46:21, 26 July 2024 for assistance on AfC submission by Klighed) feedback and haven't received any yet. I did get some useful pointers in the help chat, though to be honest I didn't understand all of them because in some cases what I was told clearly doesn't match the usual custom and practice for BLPs, which I can observe simply by browsing BLPs. Still mystified therefore about how to actually get an article published. Thank you in advance for any assistance. Klighed (talk) 15:54, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Klighed, I clearly explained the reason for declining your draft. You can view the diff at [1]. However, patience is important in situations like this. I hold no prejudice neither for not responding to your question about "why I declined your draft," nor for tagging others to weigh in on the decision. It also seems that you didn’t read the notice on my talk page. Per WP:COMMONSENSE, if someone doesn’t respond to your message, it’s better to ping them again in the same section, rather than in a different one, under the pretext of justifying the reviewer. Safely I’m frustrated by that, but I’m still willing to help if needed. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 19:31, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 13:10:32, 24 July 2024 for assistance on AfC submission by עומר תשבי

עומר תשבי (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Shalom Meckenzie ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I think there are more then enough sufficient references, addressing the subject of the article directly. Furthermore, it is worth noting that the subject has an article in Hebrew. Furthermore, it is worth noting that there are sources that are offline(magazines). I referred to one but I can refer to more. עומר תשבי (talk) 13:10, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

עומר תשבי (talk) 13:10, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@עומר תשבי, I commented on your draft. However, if you think more sources including offline sources will serve better, then you're free to cite them or share herein. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 19:59, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:DIALux

Hello, thanks a lot for reviewing the dialux draft page and your feedback on improving the page quality. I have now tried to be more precise. Better information is provided with clear references. Some of the details like for example the supported standards of the programm are hard to find. The only source for these is at least the manufacturer homepage. Who else should know these in detail?

There was a disusion on the importance of the topic on the german wikipedia site This could be of help to get an idea how significant the dialux programm is for the work with light. Thanks for your assistance. 2A02:908:1C24:5700:3816:3DE:CFAB:9321 (talk) 09:00, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing once again. The draft is now in rewritten in an encyclopedic format. The are more information now and the text has a better order. Several screens were added. Any further guidance on improving the draft would be much appreciated. 212.29.33.164 (talk) 11:49, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@212.29.33.164, I hope to give feedback after looking at the draft, but will leave it for another reviewer. Thanks for your works Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 12:02, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. I look forward to your comments. 212.29.33.164 (talk) 13:50, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Hello SafariScribe. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:SafariScribe. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=SafariScribe|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Blanes tree (talk) 22:15, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this warning I believe is spurious. It is impacted by Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Blanes tree. 104.232.119.107 (talk) 02:08, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There might be some truth in this assumption.

We received spam mails from wikisubmissions.com and idigitalakki.com after our Draft was submitted for reviewing. Both companies wanted to assist us in getting successfully approved.

Coincidence? 212.29.33.164 (talk) 08:10, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@212.29.33.164 I don't know what you may be pointing at, but I have a friend that can break it down, @Timtrent. Fwiw, no reviewer takes prejudice of declining a draft if it merits one according to WP notability guidelines. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 10:55, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All interested parties should read WP:SCAM, making any reports it suggests

@SafariScribe Despite assumptions that this notice is spurious, we can all expect to be asked the question at some point, and should give a clear and unequivocal answer to it. It matters little who asks it, it needs to be answered. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:03, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I have never edited for any payment whatsoever. My edits and works on Wikipedia is completely voluntary. If there is an report of scam from any resemblance of me, my edits, even possible fabricated lookalike username, please note it isn't me. I will advise you promptly file a report to the Wikipedia community. @104.232.119.107, @212.29.33.164, @Timtrent. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 11:15, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the clarification. I believe in it.

We should not forget that it is ultimately possible for anyone to evaluate these Pending_AfC_submissions lists and then send spam emails based on the gaterhed information.

There is no reason to say that this was SafariScribe. 212.29.33.164 (talk) 12:04, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This week's article for improvement (week 31, 2024)

Calder's Flamingo in Chicago

Hello, SafariScribe. The article for improvement of the week is:

List of public art in Chicago

Please be bold and help improve it!

Previous selections: Cape (geography) • Ambush

Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations

Posted by: MusikBot ^talk 00:05, 29 July 2024 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • [reply]

Request on 17:25:07, 29 July 2024 for assistance on AfC submission by DrBlackcow

DrBlackcow (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Sol Chin ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello. About the draft Draft:Sol Chin, I have supplemented the references and cited reliable sources based on the comments you provided when you declined the draft on July 6th. I understand that I cannot speed up the review process on my demand, but I am now curious to know if the draft has been appropriately revised so that it could be accepted quickly. I apologize for asking this question, as I am not very familiar with Wikipedia. Thank you for your understanding.

DrBlackcow (talk) 17:25, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DrBlackcow, I'll look at it the second time. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 21:10, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

o hai!

Thank you for the quality improvements and review, I need to get my dots in order - thanks for those too :D

MissAnonymous123 (talk) 02:59, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Help on how to Archive my talk page

Hello, @SafariScribe

I hope this message finds you well. I want to express my gratitude for your guidance and assistance with drafts and reviews. I am reaching out to inquire if it is appropriate to request help with archiving my talk page, as it has become quite lengthy and cluttered.

Best regards

Afrowriter (talk) 07:30, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Afrowriter, I hope this isn't late yet. Read Help:Archiving a talk page for an easy guideline. I will recommend User:Elli/OneClickArchiver, which may be easier because I use it. It will appear on the right sidebar or even add an "archive" button to all the sections of your talk page. Is there still any other question? Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 21:34, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SafariScribe Thanks for reaching out. I've been a bit busy and away from Wikipedia due to the crisis going on in this part of Cameroon. I was making preparations for a relocation. Glory be to Allah, I have been able to move with my family for the time being. I'm just now seeing this message, and I will give it a try once again. Thanks for all your assistance in making Wikipedia a safe place for some editors.

Best regards, Afrowriter (talk) 08:54, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Afrowriter, I'm very very sorry to hear that. It's similar in Nigeria, where we are having a peaceful protest. Would you like me to help you out by leaving some queries unanswered for you to attend to later? Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 09:26, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you still trying to figure things out around here like customizing my signature and so on. we keep you posted. Afrowriter👳‍♂️ (talk) 11:17, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

complainment

HEY, WHO THE HELL DO YOU THINK YOU ARE TO DECLINE ALL MY ARTICLES??? IT HAS RELIABLE SOURCES! Zanbarg (talk) 08:49, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

oH, AND YOU ALWAYS DECLINED MY ARTICLES! EVEN THE PLAYTIME FILM ARTICLE! HOW DARE YOU! Zanbarg (talk) 08:59, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could you cool it with the SHOUTING? Being rude and aggressive isn't the way to get what you want. It looks like your draft submission is lacking independent sources, unconnected from the film - simply add some of those and you can resubmit. -- D'n'B-t -- 10:51, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Marcelo Albornoz Serrano

Hello! I saw you declined this draft, but I think it fulfills WP:NPOL. Am I wrong? Broc (talk) 12:42, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Broc, I don't see that he meets WP:NPOL. There is no significant office election or appointment. Being an Undersecretary of Justice and a member of the Committee on Freedom of Association of the International Labor Organization doesn't confer that either. Maybe am missing something. Can you provide evidences of your thought, I mean what you think? Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 21:39, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 21:08:03, 30 July 2024 for assistance on AfC submission by Catycherry

Catycherry (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Antoneta Kusijanović ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thanks so much for reviewing my page! I'd love your help understanding why Antoneta Kusijanovic isn't notable enough for a page – her film Murina is very powerful, and won the top award for a first feature film at Cannes a few years ago. She's also been awarded for multiple other films, and has hundreds of press articles about her and her movies. I've created or edited pages for much less recognized folks (including a number of local DJs and fictional characters) so I'd love some guidance on the types of sources you'd like to see to demonstrate that notability.

Thanks in advance for your help!

Catycherry (talk) 21:08, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Catycherry, there's an WP:UNDUEWEIGHT with your draft. We don't need to know about her directing of Murina. Just tell us any award she has won for directing, any review of her film direction such as styles, themes, etc. Has she directed multiple notable films? I can only see you cite five or thereabout, which isn't enough for WP:NDIRECTOR. Write about her and list the films she has directed as well as maybe few awards of the film that sources recognized her impact. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 06:19, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New draft page review may have missed the sources/references ...

In regard to this new draft page Draft:Ivo_D._Dinov, the actual reliable sources of notability citations are provided but well into the article. Could you please consider rereviewing the content of the draft and confirm if it meets the academic-specific criteria? Here are a pair of conditions that are satisfied (and citations are referenced in the draft article:

According to the 8 wikipedia notability criteria, this draft page for Ivo D. Dinov, an academic satisfies at least 2 of the criteria:

#3 The person has been an elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association (e.g., a National Academy of Sciences or the Royal Society) or a fellow of a major scholarly society which reserves fellow status as a highly selective honor (e.g., Fellow of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers or Honorary Fellow of the Institute of Physics).

The scholar is an honorary member (fellow) of the Sigma Theta Tau International Society, and an elected member (fellow) of the International Statistical Institute (ISI). Both references are provided in the article.

#5 The person has held a distinguished professor appointment at a major institution of higher education and research, a named chair appointment that indicates a comparable level of achievement, or an equivalent position in countries where named chairs are uncommon.

The scholar is a named professor and chair, the University of Michigan Henry Philip Tappan Collegiate professor (reference is provided in the article, it self).

Thanks much. VodnaTopka (talk) 20:07, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SafariScribe, following this recommendation from David_notMD, this draft article, Draft:Ivo_D._Dinov, was revised. Please check again if this is a better reflection of notability. Thank you for your diligent Wikignome work. VodnaTopka (talk) 22:56, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

VodnaTopka AfC reviewers who hav declined a draft do not necessarily conduct another review. David notMD (talk) 04:34, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@David notMD, it's not helpful with such a reply. A second opinion gives a reviewer (sometimes along other reviewers) another time to revise the draft again but it appears I have missed this one. @VodnaTopka, kudos with your accepted draft–article, and continue adding your knowledge to Wikipedia. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 21:23, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stella (Trane) Jackson

Good morning. I am just asking for some tips on how to get this page posted. I am a summer intern at Trane Technologies and it is my last day today so I am hoping to leave with some tips I can give the person who will be taking over this project. Thanks! 32.141.76.18 (talk) 12:33, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@32.141.76.18, I thought I have listed that already. If not, link the draft here for me to take a second look. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 07:05, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gangadhar Nehru

Hi @SafariScribe, Hope you are doing well. I saw that you are reject my previous draft Draft:Gangadhar Nehru, Do you really think that the article does not pass WP:GNG? Whereas the subject is mentioned in hundreds of english, Hindi, and even Urdu language books. And there are many books which are not available on the internet, which you can put in the category of (WP:OFFLINE). I think you should check again. Thank You with warm regards! Youknow? (talk) 15:09, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) @Youknow?, the books you provided lack page numbers. Can you provide them for verification? Best, Reading Beans 11:37, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your FAC

Hi SafariScribe, I'm really sorry I missed your entry. It's a good article, perhaps a bit on the long side, but who am I to talk! and it was very rude of me to ignore your talk page message to me. I guess I just forgot. Goldfish memory me. Anyway, I was thinking of retiring, but I might put one more FAC up first. More importantly, if you put Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie up again ping me. Or email me. It won't be canvassing, because you've already tried the neutral way once. After that, all bets are off :) I hope it hasn't discouraged you, and I hope I haven't been part of that discouragement. Apologies to you again! ——Serial Number 54129 16:24, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh no. Serial Number 54129, I understand and I will do that when I finally renominate. I will stay off like a week before starting some removal, restructuring, resizing, copyediting, e.t.c. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 07:03, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Promotional wording

Hi, you recently tagged Naver Dictionary as having wording that reads promotional. I posted on Talk:Naver Dictionary about the tag seefooddiet (talk) 16:51, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Seefooddiet, I have edited and removed some promotional contents from the article, hence my removal of the tag. Also remember that Wikipedia doesn't value unnecessary things to know about a company, book, etc. I mean things that aren't encyclopedic. However, I thank you most graciously for your benevolent editings towards contributing from another language to English Wikipedia. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 19:44, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Boris FX

Hi there. You removed this source as not being reliable on the draft article for Her Name Was Moviola. The Art of the Guillotine blog on the BorisFX website is by the highly respected and published author and expert Steve Hullfish, and is a legitimate and very long running series of interviews and articles about film editing. Saying “you don’t remember” Boris FX being a credible source is not very fair if you are unfamiliar with how highly regarded this industry publication is, considering the contributors are renowned and world leading experts in the field of film editing. Please could you look at what you consider to be reliable again and perhaps help some more because it feels like it was just your opinion as to what’s credible rather than knowledge of what’s credible that has removed many sources from the article. 82.34.255.209 (talk) 06:44, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@82.34.255.209, can you link the draft? Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 07:00, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the page: Draft:Her Name Was Moviola. Thank you for your help. 95.146.43.33 (talk) 12:42, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Poupette Kenza

Hello @SafariScribe, you declined the submission of this article : Draft:Poupette Kenza, which is mostly a translation of the French wikipedia article. The reasons for your refusal are lack of reliable sources, lack of significant coverage. The contrary is true: there are a number of focused articles, by quality secondary sources. Le Monde, Le Point, Le Figaro, Libération… are among the French most significant & reliable French newspapers. The articles they published don't just report some facts : they analyze the phenomenon this person embodies. Among others, you may want to check:

1. Le Monde : https://www.lemonde.fr/pixels/article/2023/02/18/poupette-kenza-exhibe-sa-vie-de-femme-au-foyer-a-ses-millions-d-abonnes-sur-snapchat_6162397_4408996.html

2. Franceinfo : https://www.francetvinfo.fr/internet/reseaux-sociaux/soupcons-de-maltraitance-publicite-cachee-qui-est-l-influenceuse-poupette-kenza-au-c-ur-de-plusieurs-polemiques_6012842.html

3. Ouest-France : https://mcetv.ouest-france.fr/mon-mag-buzz/people/poupette-kenza-debarque-sur-tiktok-et-pulverise-tous-les-records-24012023/

4. Radio France : https://www.radiofrance.fr/franceinter/podcasts/capture-d-ecrans/capture-d-ecrans-du-mercredi-28-decembre-2022-1263560

5. Le Point : https://www.lepoint.fr/societe/qui-est-poupette-kenza-l-influenceuse-qui-enchaine-les-bourdes-17-05-2024-2560439_23.php

6. BFMTV : https://www.bfmtv.com/tech/actualites/reseaux-sociaux/maltraitance-detournement-de-fonds-placements-de-produit-poupette-kenza-l-influenceuse-en-constante-polemique_AV-202308170305.html

7. 20 Minutes : https://www.20minutes.fr/faits_divers/4100520-20240709-seine-maritime-pourquoi-influenceuse-poupette-kenza-incarceree

8. Le HuffPost : https://www.huffingtonpost.fr/life/article/poupette-kenza-quand-la-surexposition-des-enfants-d-influenceurs-pose-probleme_214358.html

9. Le Parisien : https://www.leparisien.fr/faits-divers/cagnotte-detournee-linfluenceuse-poupette-kenza-et-lorphelinat-trouvent-un-accord-des-soupcons-persistent-05-07-2023-HYAFBHMRKFANVFPLQYA4TGX75M.php

10. Libération : https://www.liberation.fr/societe/religions/je-ne-travaille-avec-aucun-juif-linfluenceuse-poupette-kenza-dans-le-viseur-de-la-justice-apres-des-propos-antisemites-20240516_RKQJX4KKZJGGXOKXNCPJQPFZJM/

11. Le Figaro : https://www.lefigaro.fr/secteur/high-tech/l-influenceuse-poupette-kenza-au-coeur-d-une-nouvelle-polemique-apres-des-propos-antisemites-20240516

We've got coverage that's focused, analytic, and reliable - and I therefore think you should reconsider your refusal. AYGFS (talk) AYGFS (talk) 07:05, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@AYGFS, sources in an article must meet ~~WP:SIRS~~ WP:NBIO. Yes, a French celebrity but not notable. Your draft is written like an expanded CV and overall spectacular promotional news. Try trimming down irrelevant words that doesn't show any encyclopedic information about Kenza. By the way, do you have any relationship with the draft you have written? If so, you should also declare it by reading WP:COI before your draft will be considered Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 06:52, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would be happy to accept the draft after you have done the above. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 06:56, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My draft has all that's required: a noticable subject, multiple reliable sources, a neutral wording, etc. Since you won't see it now, my guess is you wouldn't see it in the future either - whatever more I (or anybody else) could write. Anyhow, thanks for your tine and farewell. AYGFS (talk) 10:22, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@AYGFS you are welcome to resubmit it and another reviewer will take look but give WP:NOTGOSSIP a read first. It does come off more as a diary in some parts and for controversial claims make sure you are using high-quality sources. Safari, WP:SIRS is only applicable to organizations. This is about a person so WP:NBIO is the relevant guideline. S0091 (talk) 15:20, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@S0091, thanks for the refresh. I almost got to say WP:42. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 17:27, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, 42 is a good one and one I also forget about. S0091 (talk) 17:32, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Academic notability

Hi, my draft was recently rejected due to not meeting any of the academic notability specific criteria, even though the subject meets several of the academic specific criteria, most notably first, third, fifth and sixth criteria.

1st: Like I wrote in the draft, a peer-reviewed Festschrift was dedicated to the subject recently, which already satisfies the first criteria by itself, according to the academic notability page criteria note 1c.

3rd: Like I wrote in the draft, Lavento is a member/fellow of Finnish Society of Sciences and Letters, which is the practically the Royal Society of Finland.

5th: Finland uses the German academic rank system, where the professor is the highest possible chair and only awarded to the most distinguished researchers, which makes it similar to a distinguished professor.

6th: Lavento was the chairman of the Finnish Antiquarian Society, which is the oldest and the most notable of all scholarly cultural heritage societies in Finland.

How should I edited the article that these points are more apparent? I've already cited the societies where the membership/professor status are mentioned. And do you think these sources are not clear enough for a non-finnish/swedish speaker? Thanks in advance. MrGakster (talk) 19:53, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DoubleGrazing mind having a look at this one given your knowledge of Finnish. @MrGakster you may have a point but will see.

On another note, SafariScribe I notice many queries go unanswered. If you are going to review hundreds of drafts be prepared to answer questions/address concerns regarding your declines. S0091 (talk) 20:42, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@S0091, some of the questions are duplicated/asked or answered either at the AFC help desk or teahouse. I try my best to respond as I am going through a short time stress. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 21:06, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing suggests otherwise. If you are "going through a short time stress" then I suggest slowing down. S0091 (talk) 21:14, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SS Hi there. You are reviewing drafts too quickly and I mean it. You are doing a good job actually, but it would be better if you decide to actually take care in reviewing the drafts. For example, I've accepted some drafts which your initially declined, maybe because you didn't really pay attention to the details. Just as S0091 has noted, since you're having stress (in real life?), it would be best to take a break from reviewing drafts and come back anytime you want. That is by the way. If you'd want to continue despite your stress, and to avoid these plenty of unanswered threads on your talk page, leaving a very detailed reason of your decline would still help. For example, don't just use the in-built AFCH decline reason, convey your own view using the comment box, this would probably address any possible questions the submitter would have, you comment could refer them to specific guides/policies that would help them better. Overall, I love the fact that you're learning so quickly from your mistakes. I hope you recover from your stress as soon as possible. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:28, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the ping, @S0091. I fully agree with @MrGakster's contentions regarding NACADEMIC points #1, #3 and #6. I'm not sure I entirely agree with #5; yes, it's true that there isn't anything higher than Professor, but whether that automatically makes Professor = Distinguished Professor, is perhaps debatable. Nevertheless, this draft is a clear pass; I'll go ahead and accept it. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:16, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for checking and accepting the draft @DoubleGrazing! And good luck to you too @SafariScribe! MrGakster (talk) 21:07, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@S0091, @Vanderwaalforces, @DoubleGrazing, thank you all for the resolve and encouragement. Congratulations @MrGakster. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 17:50, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To be clear, you have not done anything bad or even close. Everyone learns differently but they way I learn (I am always learning) is reading the AfC Helpdesk; everyone's responses are helpful as are Jéské Couriano's source assessments. I also follow up on past reviews to see if they were later accepted or declined again by others and rely on the second check by NPP for my accepts. Given you are an NPP reviewer, you might consider not marking your accepts as reviewed (up to you). Everyone makes mistakes and certainly opinions differ about what is acceptable or not and sometimes I look back on a review and wonder what the heck I was thinking. :) Based on the activity on your talk page, you have several experienced editors watching so likely if you had a question you could ask here and someone would answer. You are also welcome to ping me or visit my talk page, even if it is to disagree with something I have done. S0091 (talk) 18:25, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@S0091, it's usually a rare action for me to mark my accept as reviewed. I do that on a very needful case, where I edited simultaneously with many editors or that I am fully sure. In short, I take NPP guideline a double time before marking. Welp, I also rely on NPP for a second look of my accept. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 18:35, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, I thought it marked it as reviewed automatically because AfC reviewers who are also NPP have stated they mark their accepts as unreviewed. My language did not make that clear. S0091 (talk) 19:06, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Carrozzeria Coriasco

You rejected this draft as not meeting the Reliable Sources guidelines - there is literally a book written about Coriasco, by an uninvolved author. I can add more sources, but if you think that a standalone book on the topic does not meet WP:RS then I am not sure what it will take. Sannia's Carrozzieri book is also excellent (with an introduction by Leonardo Fioravanti and the foreword written by Umberto Eco), while Autoweek.nl and La Escuderia seem perfectly reliable to me. Please clarify your interpretation of WP:RS so that I know what has to be done in this case. Mr.choppers | ✎ 20:24, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) @Mr.choppers Hi there, first off, please provide exact page numbers of the books you cited. Page numbers of the book that verify the statement the citation is put next to. They will ease review as you cannot just cite an entire book for a single (or two) sentence(s). That being said, the draft is also kind of written in an unencyclopaedic tone, you might want to restructure some of the sentences in the second section and put that list as pure prose instead. I'd also say that the citations are not sufficient because there are some sentences that lacks citations from the second section. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:44, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Vanderwaalforces: I didn't write it - I do own one of the reference works and will add page numbers accordingly. Are you saying that to pass WP:DRAFT, an article has to be perfect and complete? Last I checked, articles should only be rejected if they would have been deleted if put up for AfD - which is clearly not the case here. As for the possibly uncited sentences, I will quote WP:AFCR: Avoid declining an article because it correctly uses general references to support some or all of the material. The content and sourcing policies require inline citations for only four specific types of material, most commonly direct quotations and contentious material about living persons. I see nothing potentially contentious (except possibly "Thanks to the success with the 600 Multipla and 850 T derivates, in Italy 'Coriasco' nowadays is a household name for light vans.") As for the style of writing, it was written by someone who's a non-native English speaker, but AFCR has minor issues like that covered, too: ...accept the article and tag it with maintenance templates to alert other editors to issue(s)..

To list or not is a matter of opinion, I would say putting that content in prose would be turgid and hard to read. But again, this is not cause for rejecting an article. Mr.choppers | ✎ 00:54, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Mr.choppers I wasn’t telling you why the draft was declined — I was pointing out a few things I noticed. And by the way, I personally will not accept a draft if I can’t not verify the claims it makes from the cited sources, because whether you like it or not, the verifiability rules is key and it applies to all articles and drafts. I don’t want to address the fact that you own one of the cited materials on the draft… that sounds like you’re citing your own book, citing your own opinion. I’d recuse here and leave the review for someone else whenever you resubmit it. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 06:19, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Vanderwaalforces: are you suggesting I am Alessandro Sannia? I recommend you withdraw your statement and apologize, and then read WP:AFCR. Mr.choppers | ✎ 14:14, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No no, you misread or misunderstood my comments. You said you own one of the referenced work right? And then you’re citing your own work in an article you’re creating. That was what I was pointing out, not saying you’re the subject. My comment is not even anywhere close to giving such impression, I’m not new to AfC and can tell you when an when not to accept a draft more appropriately. Because you do not agree with a reviewer doesn’t mean otherwise of the reviewer’s competences. I don’t plan on replying further in this matter. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:59, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You wrote that sounds like you’re citing your own book, citing your own opinion and then suggested that I "recuse" myself - you are clearly accusing me of citing a reference I wrote myself. Mr.choppers | ✎ 20:56, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Mr.choppers, I won't say your draft meets WP:GNG. The major issue is verifiability. I can't verify all those transformations he did as it was in the article, and being honest, they don't seem to have been covered in multiple reliable sources. Provide sources where relevant to help any reviewer access them and know whether to accept or decline the draft. Also, we accept drafts that we believe will pass AFD per WP policies and guidelines. If verifiability becomes a major issue of an article, then it deserves merging or deletion as the case may be. Maintenance tag is also good but should be an alte work, when the article is good enough and historically significant. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 06:46, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

First, it is not my draft, as I have already stated above and should be clear to anyone who actually reviewed the draft. There are currently seven cited sources, including one published book specifically about the company. It meets WP:N without issue. As per the guidelines, an article only needs inline citations for "four specific types of material, most commonly direct quotations and contentious material about living persons." Why can you not verify the conversions? They are cited. Again, from the guidelines: "Avoid declining an article because the reliable sources are not free, online or in English. Books, magazines, and other print-only sources are perfectly acceptable, and may as well be in another language." Your behavior seems to fall foul of WP:NOTHERE. Mr.choppers | ✎ 14:28, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Mr.choppers, I have taken time to digest the draft again and here are helps I came out with.
The sources reliably cites "Fiat 1100 Boat Car By Carrozzeria Coriasco", which may be a notable product of the company, and possibly deserves a page. If source "Alessandro, Sannia (2017). Enciclopedia dei Carrozzieri Italiani [Encyclopedia of the Italian Coachbuilders]. Turin, Italy: Societa Editrice Il Cammello. p. 192. ISBN 9788896796412 is accessible by you, because I cannot, you may email the contents including the other cited from this book. I also unfortunately have no access to source Alessandro, Sannia, ed. (2019). Carrozzeria Coriasco. Turin, Italy: Societa Editrice Il Cammello. ISBN 9788896796627. Among them, including lack of WP:SIGCOV, I can't see the draft meeting WP:NCORP. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 14:35, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A published work specifically about the company in question meets SIGCOV. You are in direct contravention of the guidelines at WP:AFCSTANDARDS; the crux and the base concern of this process is whether or not an article would survive the AfD process. If I thought you were discussing this honestly I would scan and email you pages from the Sannia (2017) but judging by your talk page you are not exhibiting good will.

Core purpose

Shortcut

WP:AFCPURPOSE

The purpose of reviewing is to identify which submissions will be deleted and which won't. Articles that will probably survive a listing at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion should be accepted. Articles that will probably not survive should be declined. Issues that do not affect the likelihood of success at AFD (e.g., halo effects like formatting) should not be considered.— Preceding unsigned comment added by user:Mr.choppers (talk • contribs)

Please consider adding specific feedback to your decline reviews

I see that so far just today you have declined over 100 draft submissions and accepted nine. I understand you must be busy but I hope you can provide comment feedback to those you decline on what the issues are beyond what is in generic template. From the comments I am seeing on your talk page this does appear to be a problem. Consider offering more assistance even if it is sacrificing efficiency. 21:42, 2 August 2024 (UTC) Myotus (talk) 21:42, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will do that. I normally use that when I feel the draft, with a little editing will be accepted by another reviewer. Cheers though. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 06:40, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blair Doroshwalther moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Blair Doroshwalther. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because please correct the formatting before submitting for review. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. UtherSRG (talk) 23:10, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The source are most reliable about the movie KAGOJ

Dear sir, if i not mistake, all the source are reliable and authenticated. Most source are from reputed and established source. Kagoj movie is such a film in bangladesh that should have an article in wikipedia. If you advice i could add more reliable source even TV coverage, review and most Award winning related source. Could i do request to check about the film once in any search engine site for for your kind Alizdirector (talk) 00:51, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can I get the link to the draft to have a second look at it? Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 00:54, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Kagoj-The_Paper Alizdirector (talk) 01:11, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Sir. It was

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Kagoj-The_Paper Alizdirector (talk) 01:20, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Israeli apartheid

Hi, are you going to carry out the move? Selfstudier (talk) 22:13, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Selfstudier, the article is protected that only admins can move it, hence my request at WP:RM/TR. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 07:11, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, OK, understood. Selfstudier (talk) 08:58, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This week's article for improvement (week 32, 2024)

Smiling woman

Hello, SafariScribe. The article for improvement of the week is:

Happiness

Please be bold and help improve it!

Previous selections: List of public art in Chicago • Cape (geography)

Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations

Posted by: MusikBot ^talk 00:05, 5 August 2024 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • [reply]

Teramaze (Band) draft

Hi. You declined a draft https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Teramaze but you didn't say specifically what is lacking. Since this wasn't the first time the draft was declined, I've had previous discussions with editors and learned more about Wikipedia criteria, and provided the changes that were requested of me.

The omission of this article in Wikipedia is IMHO quite scandalous, I would first ask editors to convince themselves that this is an internationally renowned and appreciated band, with over a dozen solid albums published. It is not the greatest band in the world, but it is also not a border-line-notable band; I think it is well over that line. I think the problem might be that they are not very money-driven, and choose to do things modernly, avoiding record labels and dealing directly with their fans throught the Internet. Until Wikipedia modernizes its own criteria for appreciating this kind of band, it does create difficulties for editors. This is the era of Bandcamp, Youtube channels and Spotify... and Wikipedia is still looking for "old school" signs of notability.

BUT this band has also published with old-school labels, and has been dealt with in the specialized press (internationally), as my sources demonstrate. It has headlined festvals on the opposite side of the globe where they are from. So we really should be able to get this article "out the door", with the current wikipedia standards.

Please tell me specifically why you declined, what you think is missing that would make this acceptable. If some statements are not sufficiently sourced I could just remove them, I would favor getting the article published first, then getting it improved. Other than that, I've had the notability discussions with previous editors that had declined it, and I feel that I have provided what was asked.

Thank you for your revision and thanks in advance for your explanations. Callmepgr (talk) 10:44, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The band doesn't seem to meet WP:BAND. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 11:28, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This was discussed in several talks with previous editors and sources were added specifically to clarify this. So you have at least (quoting from your link to WP:BAND)

5. Has released two or more albums on a major record label or on one of the more important indie labels (i.e., an independent label with a history of more than a few years, and with a roster of performers, many of whom are independently notable).

You can see that albums Anhedonia and Esoteric Symbolism are published on Nightmare Records which fits the description of "important indie label" whose roster (https://www.discogs.com/label/29981-Nightmare-Records-2) includes independently notable artists such as Balance of Power, Pyramaze, Prototype, Myrath, Anubis Gate. Their respective Wikipedia pages show charted albums etc.

Similar cases could be made for some of the other labels.

That should be enough, but I believe we can also grant that

1. Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself.

... the most prominent would be the Heavy Magazine article I cited, a print magazine. Many others in online sources that are reputable in the Prog Rock niche.

Finally there are articles commenting on headlining (headlining!) international festivals.

4. Has received non-trivial coverage in independent reliable sources of an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one sovereign country.

The part about "tours" I don't think is currently documented well-enough in the sources, but it could probably be done. However, this isn't critical to notability right now because the other elements suffice.

Please spend a couple of minutes Googling the band and take a look at concert images on Youtube, to convince yourself that this is not "my cousin's garage band". After that, if you still feel something is missing to fit Wikipedia criteria, please tell me helpfully in specific form, you could add this page, or that link, and that would suffice, and you would approve it. It's not productive to keep waiting months and going through successive editors that tell me to just add something and then after I add it, it isn't enough...

Thank you for your work on this, I appreciate it. Callmepgr (talk) 10:31, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from K.Dishaunda on User:K.Dishaunda (16:04, 5 August 2024)

User: K.Dishaunda How to add a photo? --K.Dishaunda (talk) 16:04, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @K.Dishaunda and welcome to Wikipedia. You may love to read Wikipedia:Uploading images for more ways and steps to check and take before uploading an image on Wikipedia. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 16:08, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Review changes to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Abodo_Wood

Hey, thanks for taking a look at my article draft and for your feedback. I have now edited the article again to include more sources and edit the tone to be more formal and encyclopaedic. I'd be grateful for advice to see if this is now acceptable before resubmitting. Thanks ValerieCo (talk) 04:46, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ValerieCo, my advice firstly is asking you, please, are you in any way related to the company? I mean it's not bad neither will it get the draft deleted. It's just for clarity reasons per WP:COI. To your draft, unfortunately, the tone of the draft reads promotional, like an advert. I know it isn not easy, trust me. When you're writing such draft, avoid words that seems to promote the company because Wikipedia doesn't need them. For example, you said, "Abodo Woods produces carbon-negative timbers...", whereas this phrase can be changed in a way that keepa it neutral (see my brief changes to tye draft). I have cut few of them and it is remaining many. To ease and aid your work on the draft or subsequent draft in the future, read WP:PEACOCK. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 05:25, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @SafariScribe No I'm not related in any way to the company. Thanks for the feedback, I've had another go, let me know how this looks now. ValerieCo (talk) 05:59, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your comments on Draft:Carrozzeria Coriasco

Hello SafariScribe. Thank you for your input on my draft article on Coriasco. Another user and I have made a bunch of edits and added many references. However, because you didn't really specify particular problems than the standard the draft needs multiple published sources with a listing of the requirements, we still don't know where exactly we go wrong. It would be very helpful if you'd indicate citation needed or this reference does not qualify, so we get a better picture of what exactly you think we must improve. Just a few examples will do. Thank you in advance.

Ok. I will include citation needed tags, where it is needed. Thanks for notifying me. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 03:27, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Inquiry Regarding Review Status of Accepted Draft Ryan Trey

Hello, @SafariScribe

I hope this message finds you well. I recently submitted a draft for the article Ryan Trey, which was accepted a few weeks ago. However, I have not received any follow-up notification indicating that the draft has been reviewed.

From my understanding, once a draft is accepted, there is typically a notification that follows to confirm its review status. In this case, I have not received such a notification.

Could you kindly enlighten me on how the review process works and what steps I should take to ensure that the draft has been properly reviewed? Any guidance you can provide would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you very much for your assistance.

Best regards

And Please stay safe been seeing the news lately about the crisis in your country Afro^📢t@lk 08:52, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Afrowriter, when an article is accepted, it will appear in the article space, but this doesn't mean it has been reviewed under WP:NPP. An AFC reviewer with NPP rights can mark it as reviewed if they are confident it won't face deletion through AFD. As an AFC reviewer, I generally don't mark the pages I accept as reviewed because I prefer to get a second opinion during the NPP review process. I hope that makes sense to you now? Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 11:02, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh! The protest has been peaceful. Grazie di curro. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 11:02, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thank you now i understand better the said article has just been reviewed thanks Afro^📢t@lk 11:20, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hi hi https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Afsheen_(musician)

Hi Safari. You were the last one to decline by draft, but I do not agree with your decision. I had multiple independent sources there. I did no have a section for discography, so it was hard for you to understand and navigate it, but I had sources for it included in the article. I believe you should review all the sources, and you can see most of those were added upon your review. I do not think my article is any different from this article you reviewer above Ryan Trey.

I had a long discussion about it, some editor was complaining that I even get paid out of the blue. An editors helped me fix the issues with the draft and i made an entire new section. You can see yourself, I made about 3 articles in total, one deleted or not, I am not sure. I need a presentation about articles I made for school. I wrote about topics, or people whose work I know. I do not know what another article to make if this will be deleted. It takes time to find information. If you have time, do you think you can review it? I am not saying my article is more important than any.

I was thinking maybe i should finds a city to make an article about or some small village, so that would have 100% chance to be accepted. Or maybe can you suggest an underrepresented subject? J2009j (talk) 20:53, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You've resubmitted right? I will check it later. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 03:25, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I re-submitted it, so please, take a look, I had those sources there, and added explanations in new section Discography, so you can see. J2009j (talk) 16:38, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@J2009j, sources 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 aren't reliable. I think you need to read WP:RS and cite national newspapers/articles/magazines with a Wikipedia page. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 18:22, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to add all available on google. There are radios and charts. I do not know what category it fits. I added a discography section, like an editor told me, from the website of the national radio. I believe he also meets the WP:COMPOSER. He composed many songs, and some of those have separate pages on wikipedia. J2009j (talk) 18:51, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing about the age or birthday is online, so I did not add it, because I do not know. Hope that is fine. J2009j (talk) 18:52, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will be waiting for your review. I believe the sources there are sufficient, i just had a wrong structure so you did not see. What do you think? I read about WP:COMPOSER too. J2009j (talk) 15:46, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will help you restructure and remove unreliable sources. Is that ok for you? Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 22:45, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Andamiro draft

Hey, i noticed my draft regarding Andamiro was denied a bit ago.

I dont quite understand what exactly is wrong with my references, the description on the top of my page is not descriptive enough, as its a bit of a broad message.

Draft:Andamiro

Its just kinda confusing, i'm not natively english and a lot of this topic is in korean so i had to use a translator for some articles, so its difficult to understand what i'm trying to look for. Andamiro has a large presence in NA and korea, so i would like to have a good external source of information that is not monitored by the company itself. HyperNover (talk) 21:53, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In a general view, your draft doesn't appear to meet WP:NCORP. The sources and content are dubious and few, promotional.. Source 1 is the company's website without any "profile/bio/about" information. Source 3 is from an unreliable source, Intergame Online. Source 5 is an OT, talking about the meaning of "Andamiro", which is not necessary. Source 6 & 7 are both directories and thus, unreliable. Also, the information including the "current company's capital" is not necessary at all. The draft should show how the company is notable, it should show appearance in multiple news, e.t.c. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 22:54, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]